Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:18:04
Server time: 20:41:55, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): chrismcsherbert | JourneyKan | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Pollution Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Catholic Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2056

Description[?]:

This act regulates how much pollution is dumped into the air and sea to help make our country a more beautiful place to live.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:07:31, May 21, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democrat Party
ToDebating the Pollution Act
MessageI agree with this. It has been proposed before and failed to get passed. However, I think it may succeed now.

Date16:36:08, May 21, 2005 CET
FromNational Democratic Party
ToDebating the Pollution Act
Messagei agree

Date20:52:45, May 21, 2005 CET
FromNational Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Pollution Act
Messageno, there should be no regulations of pollution. The industries should realize that the world is a resource worth saving, and do it without laws forcing them to.

Date23:32:06, May 21, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democrat Party
ToDebating the Pollution Act
Messagecos thats gonna happen!

Date01:06:22, May 22, 2005 CET
FromConservative Catholic Party
ToDebating the Pollution Act
MessageWill move to vote soon

Date02:41:54, May 22, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Progressive Party
ToDebating the Pollution Act
MessageWe will back this bill as well!

Date20:27:24, May 22, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Centre Party of Gaduridos
ToDebating the Pollution Act
MessageWe agree with the goal of reducing pollution, but highly restrictive regulations will cost too many jobs. What is the point of cleaner air if it forces people into poverty and unemployment? We need to find a balance between the environment and the economy, and I think we have found it with moderate pollution restrictions.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 133

no
  

Total Seats: 40

abstain
 

Total Seats: 27


Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve.

Random quote: "I think that gay marriage is something that should be between a man and a woman." - Arnold Schwarzenegger

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73