We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Blashpemy Act of 3938
Details
Submitted by[?]: Cystiȝ Partei (Liberal Party)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3939
Description[?]:
| Prologue: The states regulation of blasphemy as a crime, is barbaric and unwanted in this nation. We want to represent the peoples ideas that blasphemy is only a crime in the eyes of the religious doctrine and not the state. Articles. 1. All crimes defining blasphemy of the state religion are to be removed from the criminal code. No one can be imprisoned or punished for blasphemy. 2. All criminals convicted of blasphemy acts are to be pardoned (this does not and will not include any other crime charges.) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change State penalties for blasphemy
Old value:: Both private and public blasphemy are considered grave offenses, and are heavily prosecuted.
Current: No state penalties are issued for blasphemy.
Proposed: No state penalties are issued for blasphemy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:59:31, November 16, 2015 CET | From | Cystiȝ Partei (Liberal Party) | To | Debating the Blashpemy Act of 3938 |
| Message | Articles. 1. All crimes defining blasphemy of the state religion are to be removed from the criminal code. No one can be imprisoned or punished for blasphemy. 2. All criminals convicted of blasphemy acts are to be pardoned (this does not and will not include any other crime charges.) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes | Total Seats: 100 | |
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson |