Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 01:50:18
Server time: 06:09:41, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): blowingnorthwind | hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Bill Dispute Resolution

Details

Submitted by[?]: Grand Nationalist Fraction

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3942

Description[?]:

Some bills have been put to voe even before any of the MP's had the chance to discuss the contents. Therefore we suggest to keep bills in debate for at least 4 months. We realise some bills are urgent, and those bills should be put to vote as soon as possible.
On passage of this bill, any new proposition, if not urgent, will be under debate for at least 4 months.

Lort Karav
NWL spokesman
Minister of Foreign Affairs

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:27:38, November 23, 2015 CET
FromCourt of Shades
ToDebating the Bill Dispute Resolution
MessageMr Speaker,

The Court of Shades disagrees with this proposal.

Our party believes that parties should do this anyway for their own self-interest. If a bill has been debated, then it has more chance of gaining support and being compromised for.

However, passing bills are not the only intention for creating them. Some bills are designed to send political messages and show the public who stands on what side of an issue. These types of bills do not require debate and in fact would waste Parliaments time in debating them.

Therefore, the Court of Shades disagrees with this proposal.

High Priest Harry Darren
CoS Leader.

Date02:41:52, November 23, 2015 CET
FromPro Lodamunese Unitarian Party
ToDebating the Bill Dispute Resolution
MessageWe agree with CoS, if a party creates a bill, it should be the party that chooses if the bill should be debated or not, some bills would just be a big waste of time debating.

Important bills should be debated, but not necessarily all of them, it would just slow the democratic process down

George Lodamun
PLUP President

Date02:55:02, November 23, 2015 CET
FromLiberal Progressive Alliance
ToDebating the Bill Dispute Resolution
MessageM. Speaker,

We echo the sentiments of the CoS and PLUP.

Terry Hawthorne
Leader of the LPA

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 90

no
     

Total Seats: 348

abstain
  

Total Seats: 161


Random fact: Cultural Protocol bills must provide a real-life equivalent or short description for the ethnic groups, languages and religions contained in them, such that it would be easy for an unfamiliar player to understand (e.g. "Dundorfian = German"). Where appropriate, they should also provide guidance to players on where to find help with translations and character names. This might include, for example, links to Google Translate, Behind the Name's Random Name Generator and Fantasy Name Generators.

Random quote: "It is better to abolish serfdom from above than wait for it to abolish itself from below." - Alexander II of Russia

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49