Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 01:16:25
Server time: 06:43:34, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): blowingnorthwind | Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: NWL006 - Population Control Act 3953

Details

Submitted by[?]: Grand Nationalist Fraction

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 3953

Description[?]:

NWL does not feel the need to further promote population growth. Since there is no need for any control, we suggest to change the policy and have families choose for themselves how few or how many children they will have.

Luigi Corason

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:05:32, December 14, 2015 CET
FromTraditional Alliance
ToDebating the NWL006 - Population Control Act 3953
MessageOur policy is to support families. We should do everything we can to encourage population growth.

Date00:07:35, December 15, 2015 CET
FromCourt of Shades
ToDebating the NWL006 - Population Control Act 3953
MessageMr Speaker,

We don't believe that this policy should be used to intefere with family matters.

However, actively promoting population growth can be, and should be, done by encouraging immigration.

Therefore, we will not be supporting this policy.

Jane Black
Acting CoS Leader

Date07:31:14, December 15, 2015 CET
FromGrand Nationalist Fraction
ToDebating the NWL006 - Population Control Act 3953
MessageMr. Speaker,

we are not against immigration, but our stance is that we should not actively promote immigration. As a nationalist fraction, we welcome immigrants that respect our national laws and our culture. But then again, we prefer our own citizens to reproduce, eventhough while leaving them the choice how many children they want.

Lort Karav
NWL chairman

Date22:44:36, December 15, 2015 CET
FromTraditional Alliance
ToDebating the NWL006 - Population Control Act 3953
MessageMr Speaker,

This bill has been dragging on for a number of months. It clearly does not have support. We would encourage the NWL to bring this issue to a vote so that it can be voted down.

John Smith
Leader of the TA

Date06:51:28, December 16, 2015 CET
FromCourt of Shades
ToDebating the NWL006 - Population Control Act 3953
MessageMr Speaker,

That is a fair view to hold.

However, the CoS believe that for society to prosper immigration is necessary, so we will still be opposing this bill. However, we recognize that this is a legitimate view to hold.

Jane Black
Acting CoS Leader

Date06:56:55, December 16, 2015 CET
FromLiberal Progressive Alliance
ToDebating the NWL006 - Population Control Act 3953
MessageM. Speaker,

The LPA will be willing to support this bill. We also do not feel the need to further promote population growth in Lodamun at this time.

Terry Hawthorne
Prime Minister

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 218

no
     

Total Seats: 381

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Zardugal is a nation based on the old Byzantine Empire, with a modern twist and the Esperanto language. Zardugal is located on the continent of Majatra.

    Random quote: "Man is by nature a political animal." - Aristotle

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 62