We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Agriculture Reform, Enclosure Movement
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social-Conservative party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2176
Description[?]:
| We feel that the current decision is despicible and against the will of the people, so we propose this, once again. For the future of our food production and people. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning farm size.
Old value:: Farm size regulations are determined by local governments.
Current: Farm size is not regulated.
Proposed: Farms that grow too large are broken up and the land redistributed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:31:44, January 17, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform, Enclosure Movement |
| Message | i am afraid for this proposal i am for a devolved decision. |
| Date | 14:56:17, January 17, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform, Enclosure Movement |
| Message | For once, we actually agree with the ONCP. We oppose this measure. Leave it for the local governments. |
| Date | 17:07:28, January 17, 2006 CET | From | DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform, Enclosure Movement |
| Message | 'We agree with this proposal. Agriculture works best when it is done naturally and communally - just as God intended. Say no to factory farms!' - The Prophet DaVida |
| Date | 17:24:38, January 17, 2006 CET | From | Redneck Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform, Enclosure Movement |
| Message | We Oppose this as well. |
| Date | 17:45:52, January 17, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform, Enclosure Movement |
| Message | The Cheaters unite, nice to see. |
| Date | 18:34:48, January 17, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform, Enclosure Movement |
| Message | I don't consider myself a cheater and I think the ONCP would take offense too. However, this reeks of socialism and we have had our fill of them. They are gone now because they were rejected by the people. |
| Date | 22:05:17, January 17, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform, Enclosure Movement |
| Message | Finally someone who speak ! And you know perfectly well what i meant by cheating. Perhaps it reeks of socialism, just like many of yours reeks of Fascism, not all parts of ideologies are nessesarily bad. But we say that this is not a matter of socialism, or any other ideology, only facts of how efficient farming is conducted. |
| Date | 00:57:47, January 18, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform, Enclosure Movement |
| Message | We abhore fascism as well. We do not like either extreme and will fight both till our dying breath. |
| Date | 00:58:28, January 18, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform, Enclosure Movement |
| Message | We also do not like socialism and we will fight that too. Because this looks like socialism, we'll oppose the measure. |
| Date | 12:11:17, January 19, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform, Enclosure Movement |
| Message | I take no offence I simply don't agree on this isse. What does abhore mean? It is merely but merely an economic policy on the farming industry that any one is entitled to adopt. There is nothingto be disliked about it. And i can think of more than once where the rightis party has said "for once we agree with the majority opinion. |
| Date | 04:18:56, January 25, 2006 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform, Enclosure Movement |
| Message | Abhore means hate (the verb form, I mean). We support. Monopolies and oligopolies are allocatively inefficient. They produce less at high prices and damage the economy by not making use of all resources. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 88 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 211 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "Most politicians hold their fingers to the wind, and if we win we'll be showing them a lot of wind." - Ralph Nader |