We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Compromise Defence Industries Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Telamon Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2173
Description[?]:
| In the interest of finding issues on which constructive compromise can be found, we propose some legislation. We also wish to point out, that our own reluctance to some compromises does not constitute a hostility towards compromise per se as there are many ways of compromising. We also would like to emphasise, that compromise relates not only to parties finding a middle ground on some specific issues, but also finding a middle ground on a combination of issues, where everyone gets something and has to give in on something. In this specific case we do not demand full nationalization of defence industries but merely that state controls SOME defence industries. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:11:13, January 17, 2006 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Compromise Defence Industries Bill |
| Message | I could only agree to this and other bills like it if the private sector was allowed to provide education and healthcare etc. Then that to me would constitute a compromise |
| Date | 10:48:53, January 18, 2006 CET | From | Telamon Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Compromise Defence Industries Bill |
| Message | Private clinics are allowed. To us that constitutes allowing private sector to provide healthcare. Private universities are allowed. To us that constitutes allowing private sector to provide education. As for the etc. part we wish to remark that for example forestry is mixed between public and private sector and private post offices are allowed, both public and private television and radio are allowed. We find it hard to see how the current situation would represent an overemphasis of the role of the state. |
| Date | 12:21:32, January 18, 2006 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Compromise Defence Industries Bill |
| Message | My sincere apologies. I wrote what i did late last night and wasn't really paying much attention. In reference to education, I had forgotten that private universities were allowed, but i was refering specifically to schools and nurseries (although on the latter i see that you have made a proposal on that). I also did not mean health, i meant energy (that was what i was actually thinking of). Certainly a start on compromise has been made and my apologies if i appeared to be shifting the goal posts, which i am not!! |
| Date | 12:24:07, January 18, 2006 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Compromise Defence Industries Bill |
| Message | I will propose a new energy and education bill and see how people vote |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 152 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 128 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 75 |
| Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
| Random quote: "The key to understanding the American system is to imagine that you have the power to make nearly any law you want, but your worst enemy will be the one to enforce it." - Rick Cook |