We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reform of Education Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Traditional Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3954
Description[?]:
| Ensuring a top rate education for our children should be a high priority |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Pre-school education.
Old value:: The government leaves the pre-school education policy to local governments.
Current: The government maintains a system of free publically owned nursery and pre-school educational centres.
Proposed: The government maintains a system of free publically owned nurseries alongside unregulated private establishments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:19:06, December 17, 2015 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Reform of Education Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, we might agree with the proposal on nurseries, but not on the other one. Students should not be studying untill their 18 if they don't like school. They can offer the nation so much more. Hard work pays off sometimes. WBy proposing this you should also consider the age at which one is considered adult. Joe Anders NWL MP |
| Date | 21:41:04, December 17, 2015 CET | From | Court of Shades | To | Debating the Reform of Education Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We agree with the NWL on this matter. Jane Black CoS Acting Leader |
| Date | 23:02:23, December 17, 2015 CET | From | Traditional Alliance | To | Debating the Reform of Education Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, If it will secure the support of the NWL and the CS we will amend this bill to remove Article 1 for the time being. Could I enquirer as to whether any other parties wish to express a view on these issues? We are, as always, keen to seek consensus with our colleagues in other parties to pass mutually agreed reforms to benefit the country. Andrew d'Arcy Acting TA Leader |
| Date | 00:03:12, December 18, 2015 CET | From | Traditional Alliance | To | Debating the Reform of Education Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, As requested we have removed Article 1. Will others now support this proposal? TA |
| Date | 00:10:44, December 18, 2015 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Reform of Education Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, NWL will support this proposal. Lort Karav NWL chairman |
| Date | 00:32:01, December 18, 2015 CET | From | Traditional Alliance | To | Debating the Reform of Education Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, I thank the NWL for their constructive engagement on this bill and their support of this revised measure. We are delighted that we have been able to discuss and reach a position we can agree on. It is only through this sort of peaceful compromise and discussion that we will build a better nation. I thank the NWL for being part of this progress and democratic process! Andrew d'Arcy Acting Leader TA |
| Date | 00:40:00, December 18, 2015 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Reform of Education Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I don't care what Mr. d'Arcy is thinking. We have been voting from the heart. For once, his party came up with a positive proposal. We want what's best for Lodamun, and surprisingly this proposal seems to be a good one. We don't need any thanks for spreading our opinion... Lort Karav NWL chairman |
| Date | 01:16:21, December 18, 2015 CET | From | Lodamese Social Democratic Party (LSDP) | To | Debating the Reform of Education Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We are as (pleasantly) surprised as anyone that the TA has come up with a sensible proposal, and will happily support this bill. Ilyana Petrova LSDP Party Leader |
| Date | 01:21:05, December 18, 2015 CET | From | Traditional Alliance | To | Debating the Reform of Education Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, On the basis of the support of the NWL and the LSDP we are pleased to bring this proposal to a vote. We look forward to working with all parties to bring sensible and moderate measures to common agreement. Andrew d'Arcy Acting Leader TA |
| Date | 11:28:45, December 18, 2015 CET | From | Liberal Progressive Alliance | To | Debating the Reform of Education Act |
| Message | M. Speaker, The LPA will be voting against this bill. We believe that is is irresponsible and potentially harmful to leave these private establishments unregulated. Mark Thompson Minister of Education and Culture |
| Date | 16:53:04, December 18, 2015 CET | From | Pro Lodamunese Unitarian Party | To | Debating the Reform of Education Act |
| Message | We have reversed out initial decision and reevaluated the proposed bill, and see that the LPA's words ring true. It is irresponsible to keep these private establishments unregulated. They could do what ever they want to the children within, good or bad Think or the children! Robert Lodamun PLUP Prime Minister |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 239 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 360 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
| Random quote: "In Germany they first came for the Communists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me--and by that time no one was left to speak up." - Pastor Martin Niemoller |