We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Environmental Centralization Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pontesi Fascist Coalition
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2173
Description[?]:
| This bill will strengthen our environmental protections while not infringing on the growth of Pontesian business by giving central, consistent, and enforceable regulation. The last thing we need is 5 Pontesi regions with five separate types of regulation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of hunting.
Old value:: Hunting and fishing is not regulated.
Current: Hunting and fishing is not regulated.
Proposed: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government does not have a national park system policy.
Current: The government does not have a national park system policy.
Proposed: The government designates ecological preservation zones but does not fund their oversight.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government does not intervene with regard to the replantation of trees.
Current: The government encourages, but does not require new and replacement plantation.
Proposed: The government encourages, but does not require new and replacement plantation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:15:39, January 17, 2006 CET | From |  GotNation Party | To | Debating the Environmental Centralization Bill |
| Message | This stops short of the real needs to preserve natural resources. Strengthen articles 2 & 3 for my support. |
| Date | 20:14:22, January 17, 2006 CET | From | Friedrich Hayek Party | To | Debating the Environmental Centralization Bill |
| Message | The GotNation Party should vote yes anyway as that would show to the voters they want more ecological protection |
| Date | 20:20:46, January 17, 2006 CET | From | GotNation Party | To | Debating the Environmental Centralization Bill |
| Message | You do have a point, with 0 actual votes, the stance is more important than the actual outcome for GotNation. P-) |
| Date | 21:48:36, January 17, 2006 CET | From |  Pnték Znkak Prta 'Bastardry' | To | Debating the Environmental Centralization Bill |
| Message | Kurui sees this proposal as a step in the right direction, but more has to be done. |
| Date | 21:49:39, January 17, 2006 CET | From | Pnték Znkak Prta 'Bastardry' | To | Debating the Environmental Centralization Bill |
| Message | With regards to the environmental intent, that is. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 89 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 189 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 21 |
| Random fact: When your party holds the foreign affairs department, you can create new treaties. However, before writing anything new, it is a good idea to search for existing treaties which already accomplish what you desire. |
| Random quote: "Without opposition there is no politics." - Alun Daffys, former Alorian politician |