Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 01:29:22
Server time: 18:30:37, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): HopesFor | JourneyJak | RogueALD | RogueVAL | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Banning the use of biological, chemical and nuclear weaponry in times of warfare

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Liberal Peoples Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3958

Description[?]:

While this nation never buys, produces or stores mass anihilation weapons, we still use some technologies and threaten to use such weapons if another nation uses them first. This law seeks to completely outlaw such weapons.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:43:09, December 24, 2015 CET
From Social Liberal Peoples Party
ToDebating the Banning the use of biological, chemical and nuclear weaponry in times of warfare
MessageIs there a need for a debate before Voting?

Date12:56:09, December 24, 2015 CET
FromUtopia
ToDebating the Banning the use of biological, chemical and nuclear weaponry in times of warfare
MessageNo.
And we disagree, sorry. We are neutral and isolationist and we have a very small military, but in case of an attack (even though this would never happen), we have these weapons, which can only be used if another nation attacks us with these weapons first. I know that it is very bad, but that is the minimum defense we´ve got to have.

Date16:00:13, December 24, 2015 CET
From Social Liberal Peoples Party
ToDebating the Banning the use of biological, chemical and nuclear weaponry in times of warfare
MessageSo you want to destroy the planet although you have no positive use from it? Just because someone else began? That's not defense, that's military madness.

Date16:23:19, December 24, 2015 CET
FromUtopia
ToDebating the Banning the use of biological, chemical and nuclear weaponry in times of warfare
MessageI know...

Date16:24:28, December 24, 2015 CET
FromUtopia
ToDebating the Banning the use of biological, chemical and nuclear weaponry in times of warfare
MessageOk, then just remove Article 1 and you've got my vote.

Date16:41:16, December 24, 2015 CET
From Social Liberal Peoples Party
ToDebating the Banning the use of biological, chemical and nuclear weaponry in times of warfare
MessageOkay, although this is an - let's say - interesting compromise.

Date05:39:29, December 25, 2015 CET
FromThe New Order Party
ToDebating the Banning the use of biological, chemical and nuclear weaponry in times of warfare
MessageI believe that they are needed, as defence not offensive measures. So i will half to say no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 200

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453

    Random quote: "You don't have to buy from anyone. You don't have to work at any particular job. You don't have to participate in any given relationship. You can choose." - Harry Browne

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 63