We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defence of the Nation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Callaghanist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2174
Description[?]:
| Proposing that the defence of the nation is too important to be left to the private sector |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: Defence industries are privately owned but subsidised by the state.
Proposed: The state owns all defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:53:59, January 17, 2006 CET | From |  Theofascist Party | To | Debating the Defence of the Nation |
| Message | Support. |
| Date | 20:36:13, January 17, 2006 CET | From | Anarchist Party | To | Debating the Defence of the Nation |
| Message | NO And the defense of the nation is not important for us. |
| Date | 01:03:05, January 18, 2006 CET | From | Kirlawan People's National Congress | To | Debating the Defence of the Nation |
| Message | YES |
| Date | 07:09:40, January 18, 2006 CET | From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Defence of the Nation |
| Message | No, as national defense should be left to the people, the private sector. Instead of rich politicians and special interests with secret "black" budgets. |
| Date | 14:44:52, January 18, 2006 CET | From | Kirlawa Freedom Party | To | Debating the Defence of the Nation |
| Message | State has no right to interfere in industries this way |
| Date | 03:46:09, January 19, 2006 CET | From | Callaghanist Party | To | Debating the Defence of the Nation |
| Message | Having it in the govt hands would provide stability, especially during wartime. The nation would not be subject to the whims of womever had the various contracts. |
| Date | 05:55:01, January 19, 2006 CET | From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Defence of the Nation |
| Message | "Having it in the govt hands would provide stability, especially during wartime." Except in the case government funds are mis managed. Which would result in all Kirlawan citizens being extremely vulnerable to foreign attack, due to the poor decisions of a few bureaucrats. Power to the people. Vote down this fascist bill! |
| Date | 06:13:09, January 19, 2006 CET | From | Love Life Happiness | To | Debating the Defence of the Nation |
| Message | Yeah. You can't trust us with your defence money. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 102 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 265 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 88 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "The Lord is a man of war" - Exodus 15:3 |