We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Loony Religious Policy, Part II: Religious Schools
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alderdath Rabrati Konciralati Erradikati
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2174
Description[?]:
| Religions are sacred organizations. Let's keep them that way. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Any religion may set up a school, but they are strictly regulated.
Current: Any religion may set up a school, but they are strictly regulated.
Proposed: Any religion may set up a school, with no regulations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:08:37, January 18, 2006 CET | From | Alderdath Fedrali | To | Debating the Loony Religious Policy, Part II: Religious Schools |
| Message | Without those regulations they could dump basic needed courses like math, or more probably science. |
| Date | 12:09:22, January 18, 2006 CET | From | Kundrati Socialist Party | To | Debating the Loony Religious Policy, Part II: Religious Schools |
| Message | We agree with the Surprise Party. |
| Date | 00:10:33, January 19, 2006 CET | From | Alderdath Rabrati Konciralati Erradikati | To | Debating the Loony Religious Policy, Part II: Religious Schools |
| Message | What family would send their child to a school where children did not learn math or science? Such a school would be unprofitable, to say the least. |
| Date | 00:18:10, January 19, 2006 CET | From | Alderdath Fedrali | To | Debating the Loony Religious Policy, Part II: Religious Schools |
| Message | As if logic has never been overshadowed by religion in the past. |
| Date | 10:12:57, January 19, 2006 CET | From | Alderdath Lebrali Demkratti | To | Debating the Loony Religious Policy, Part II: Religious Schools |
| Message | we will oppose |
| Date | 21:21:45, January 19, 2006 CET | From | Party of Evil | To | Debating the Loony Religious Policy, Part II: Religious Schools |
| Message | We will support. If the church should stay out of the state, so should the state stay out of the church. |
| Date | 12:54:16, January 20, 2006 CET | From | Kundrati Socialist Party | To | Debating the Loony Religious Policy, Part II: Religious Schools |
| Message | Education is not "the church". |
| Date | 15:40:03, January 20, 2006 CET | From | Party of Evil | To | Debating the Loony Religious Policy, Part II: Religious Schools |
| Message | Religious education is! :P |
| Date | 13:21:54, January 21, 2006 CET | From | Kundrati Socialist Party | To | Debating the Loony Religious Policy, Part II: Religious Schools |
| Message | No. No it isn't. Education remains part of the state. It is there to fulfil a specific purpose, to inform and teach the next generation on both a social and academic basis. Standards must be set to ensure that goal is adequately achieved - and it should apply to religious schools every bit as much as secular ones. |
| Date | 04:56:03, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Alderdath Rabrati Konciralati Erradikati | To | Debating the Loony Religious Policy, Part II: Religious Schools |
| Message | Moving to a vote. |
| Date | 18:03:50, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Loony Religious Policy, Part II: Religious Schools |
| Message | Indeed. Religion is still religion, and the State has no part telling people what they can and cannot preach, but the state sure as hell has control over Secular Education, and eliminating regulation will only undermind the education of those who attend religious schools. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 156 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 149 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
| Random quote: "There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle." - Alexis de Tocqueville |