We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Green Cabinet Proposal of May 3962
Details
Submitted by[?]: Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3963
Description[?]:
| We are extremely thankful for the support of the Green Party for nuclear disarmament, therefore we announce the support of an all-green government cabinet. |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Green Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
Article 3
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Green Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Green Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Green Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Green Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Green Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Green Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Green Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Green Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Green Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Green Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Green Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:20:23, January 03, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Green Cabinet Proposal of May 3962 |
| Message | This is really quite ridiculous. If the Green Party has any respect for their own values they won't enter in to a coalition government with the Confederates. |
| Date | 21:21:09, January 03, 2016 CET | From | Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP) | To | Debating the Green Cabinet Proposal of May 3962 |
| Message | This is not a coalition proposal, this is an all-green proposal. |
| Date | 21:53:01, January 03, 2016 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Green Cabinet Proposal of May 3962 |
| Message | An all-green cabinet under a Confederate President. |
| Date | 21:59:36, January 03, 2016 CET | From | Party for Practical Progress | To | Debating the Green Cabinet Proposal of May 3962 |
| Message | Sorry Green Party, you've got to understand how ridiculous this is. |
| Date | 22:00:21, January 03, 2016 CET | From | Party for Practical Progress | To | Debating the Green Cabinet Proposal of May 3962 |
| Message | Smart move on the part of the Confederates tho to remove all their most outspoken enemies from the cabinet. |
| Date | 02:05:29, January 04, 2016 CET | From | Green Party | To | Debating the Green Cabinet Proposal of May 3962 |
| Message | I will be voting for this cabinet proposal for the sole purpose of maintaining a neutral cabinet until peace talks are resumed. I will ask for a new coalition cabinet after these talks are finished. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 384 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 366 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
| Random quote: "It is vain to talk of the interest of the community, without understanding what is the interest of the individual" - Jeremy Bentham |