We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Weapon Rights Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pro Lodamunese Unitarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3963
Description[?]:
| Freeing up some restrictions on guns, with an exception to the owners discretion on their owned property. Stephen Lodamun PLUP President |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Current: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, but these may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:17:56, January 03, 2016 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Weapon Rights Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, what types of arms are we talking about then? Should military weaponry be forbidden for the public? Or should we go further in restricting the types of weapons? Lort Karav NWL chairman |
| Date | 20:57:38, January 03, 2016 CET | From | Pro Lodamunese Unitarian Party | To | Debating the Weapon Rights Act |
| Message | This bill wasn't made with the intent of changing the types of weapons available to the public, however this bill can be changed if need be, but the intent was that we should release restrictions, mostly, on carrying weapons on public property, that's not a place of work. Of course this doesn't change the fact they need a permit to have a weapon at all, just no further restrictions. Should this bill Pass, currently all weapons available to the public now would still be available, if not changed. Stephen Lodamun PLUP President |
| Date | 16:59:31, January 04, 2016 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Weapon Rights Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, my party would like to know, since the weapons would be allowed anywhere, what weaponry we are talking about. Are there any restrictions? Lort Karav NWL chairman |
| Date | 19:19:29, January 04, 2016 CET | From | Pro Lodamunese Unitarian Party | To | Debating the Weapon Rights Act |
| Message | Pistols would be allowed in and around most public property but owners of stores or businesses can veto that right in their work place. Now as far as military grade weapons,like a rifle of any kind, if the public actually has one, they would have to keep it at their respective homes. Shotguns included. It would probably just be pistols that are allowed just anywhere. And anyone who would have the weapon on public property would be subject to police searches, just to see if they have a permit. So they would have to have their weapons permit at all times. Stephen Lodamun PLUP President |
| Date | 20:32:18, January 04, 2016 CET | From |  Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Weapon Rights Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The PLUP should put the details in the bill description. -- Joshua Fertig, Chairman of the GNRG |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 281 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 318 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "He who will not economize will have to agonize." - Confucius |