We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Compromise Private and Public Sector Relations Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Telamon Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2173
Description[?]:
| In the interest of finding issues on which constructive compromise can be found, we propose some legislation. We also wish to point out, that our own reluctance to some compromises does not constitute a hostility towards compromise per se as there are many ways of compromising. We also would like to emphasise, that compromise relates not only to parties finding a middle ground on some specific issues, but also finding a middle ground on a combination of issues, where everyone gets something and has to give in on something. In this specific case, as a combination of different areas of policy was called for, we propose redrawing the line between government and the private sector. As in most areas our economy is already mixed, we must content ourselves to proposing loosening the policy on nurseries. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Pre-school education.
Old value:: The government maintains a system of free publically owned nursery and pre-school educational centres.
Current: The government maintains a system of free publically owned nursery and pre-school educational centres.
Proposed: The government maintains a system of free publically owned nurseries alongside heavily regulated private establishments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:20:20, January 18, 2006 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Compromise Private and Public Sector Relations Bill |
| Message | My sincere apologies. I wrote what i did late last night and wasn't really paying much attention. In reference to education, I had forgotten that private universities were allowed, but i was refering specifically to schools and nurseries (although on the latter i see that you have made a proposal on that). I also did not mean health, i meant energy (that was what i was actually thinking of). Certainly a start on compromise has been made and my apologies if i appeared to be shifting the goal posts, which i am not!! |
| Date | 12:22:46, January 18, 2006 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Compromise Private and Public Sector Relations Bill |
| Message | Don't know why i posted that here!! sorry! |
| Date | 23:57:57, January 18, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Compromise Private and Public Sector Relations Bill |
| Message | crazy Sancta... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 355 | ||||||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "All within the state; nothing outside the state; nothing against the state." - Benito Mussolini |