We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military De-privatisation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mordusian Revolutionary Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3964
Description[?]:
The government should not be working with private military corporations to keep a strong military. We must keep a strong state-controlled military, and nothing more. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Proposed: The state owns all defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 09:17:45, January 06, 2016 CET | From | Derpist Party | To | Debating the Military De-privatisation |
Message | We will support this. |
Date | 13:55:24, January 06, 2016 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Military De-privatisation |
Message | We too will support this proposal. The existence of these mercenaries is quite frightening. |
Date | 14:16:17, January 06, 2016 CET | From | Mordusian Communist Party | To | Debating the Military De-privatisation |
Message | We will support this. |
Date | 20:11:37, January 06, 2016 CET | From | Mordusian Traditionalist Party | To | Debating the Military De-privatisation |
Message | "Privately owned defence industries" refers to companies that produce the equipment, tools, etc that the military uses. It has nothing to do with mercenaries. As everyone can see in the military section, we have a fully standing army, navy, and air force comprised of citizens that provides for the defense of the country. Anyone confusing private companies producing products for the military and using private companies to staff the armed forces are confusing apples for oranges (at best). |
Date | 22:03:27, January 06, 2016 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Military De-privatisation |
Message | Even so, we are against the production of arms within the borders of Mordusia. In reference to our previous comment, we apologise as it seems we made assumptions. Still, we, the WLP believe that our production of weapons could have repercussions in neighbouring countries. These private companies could easily sell arms to militia, mercenaries and terrorists. Therefore we should support the passing of this bill even if it does damage the private sector. |
Date | 23:30:09, January 06, 2016 CET | From | Mordusian Traditionalist Party | To | Debating the Military De-privatisation |
Message | This is a disaster of a bill for our economy domestically and in a global environment. Also, in response to WLP, our country has standing law against the export and/ or sale of arms to anyone but close allies. |
Date | 02:16:20, January 07, 2016 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Military De-privatisation |
Message | Sorry, we should have checked the current legislation regarding the export and sale of arms. With this new knowledge we have to agree with the NDFM. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 26 | |||
no | Total Seats: 74 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 21 |
Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity. |
Random quote: "There is a mandate to impose a voluntary return to traditional values." - Ronald Reagan |