Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5477
Next month in: 02:19:16
Server time: 21:40:43, April 30, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ADM Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military De-privatisation

Details

Submitted by[?]: Mordusian Revolutionary Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3964

Description[?]:

The government should not be working with private military corporations to keep a strong military. We must keep a strong state-controlled military, and nothing more.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:17:45, January 06, 2016 CET
FromDerpist Party
ToDebating the Military De-privatisation
MessageWe will support this.

Date13:55:24, January 06, 2016 CET
FromSocial Democrats
ToDebating the Military De-privatisation
MessageWe too will support this proposal. The existence of these mercenaries is quite frightening.

Date14:16:17, January 06, 2016 CET
FromMordusian Communist Party
ToDebating the Military De-privatisation
MessageWe will support this.

Date20:11:37, January 06, 2016 CET
FromMordusian Traditionalist Party
ToDebating the Military De-privatisation
Message"Privately owned defence industries" refers to companies that produce the equipment, tools, etc that the military uses. It has nothing to do with mercenaries. As everyone can see in the military section, we have a fully standing army, navy, and air force comprised of citizens that provides for the defense of the country.

Anyone confusing private companies producing products for the military and using private companies to staff the armed forces are confusing apples for oranges (at best).

Date22:03:27, January 06, 2016 CET
FromSocial Democrats
ToDebating the Military De-privatisation
MessageEven so, we are against the production of arms within the borders of Mordusia. In reference to our previous comment, we apologise as it seems we made assumptions. Still, we, the WLP believe that our production of weapons could have repercussions in neighbouring countries. These private companies could easily sell arms to militia, mercenaries and terrorists. Therefore we should support the passing of this bill even if it does damage the private sector.

Date23:30:09, January 06, 2016 CET
FromMordusian Traditionalist Party
ToDebating the Military De-privatisation
MessageThis is a disaster of a bill for our economy domestically and in a global environment. Also, in response to WLP, our country has standing law against the export and/ or sale of arms to anyone but close allies.

Date02:16:20, January 07, 2016 CET
FromSocial Democrats
ToDebating the Military De-privatisation
MessageSorry, we should have checked the current legislation regarding the export and sale of arms. With this new knowledge we have to agree with the NDFM.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 26

no
   

Total Seats: 74

abstain
  

Total Seats: 21


Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity.

Random quote: "There is a mandate to impose a voluntary return to traditional values." - Ronald Reagan

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63