Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 03:08:00
Server time: 04:51:59, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Progressive Reform Bill - Anti-Indoctrination

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progressive Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2176

Description[?]:

We believe that the schools have no reason to force students into singing the national anthem, even for special occasions. Therefore, we wish to change this law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:12:54, January 19, 2006 CET
FromProletariat Revolution Party
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Anti-Indoctrination
MessageWe agree and never liked the fact that this was ever changed in the first place.

Date21:32:09, January 20, 2006 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Anti-Indoctrination
MessageThe AAS supports.

Date00:41:46, January 21, 2006 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Anti-Indoctrination
MessageWe believe schools have no reason not to force children to sing our national anthemn on special occasions.

Date16:59:04, January 23, 2006 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Anti-Indoctrination
MessageWe believe that teaching our national anthem is essential; and only by singing it will they learn it. Therefore, we support the sataus quo.

Date18:01:21, January 23, 2006 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Anti-Indoctrination
MessageResponse to the RLP: But the 'status quo' of which the RLP speaks, is a relatively new invention. For much MORE of Likatonian history, the 'status quo' involved NOT forcing children to sing the national anthem.

Also - why is singing the national anthem 'essential'? It is patriotic, and you cannot legitimately FORCE patriotism.

All that FORCING children to sing the anthem does, is breed a generation of children that pay lip-service to the anthem.

Date18:30:15, January 23, 2006 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Anti-Indoctrination
MessageIt is the teaching of the national anthem which is essential; because it is a part of our proud cultural heritage. Forcing children to sing it is essential only in so much as recitation is an essential part of learning any work of verse or song.

Date18:38:08, January 23, 2006 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Anti-Indoctrination
MessageIs the RLP not, currently, OPPOSING legislation to preserve heritage?

Date14:52:26, January 26, 2006 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Progressive Reform Bill - Anti-Indoctrination
MessageThe Strength Party now has the vote. Whether this legislation stands or falls, is in their hands.

(220 in favour, 242 opposed: Stregth Party having 38 votes).

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 220

no
      

Total Seats: 242

abstain
 

Total Seats: 38


Random fact: You can view helpful ideological statistics about the regions in your nation on the region pages. You can also view detailed political opinions and the importance of them there as well.

Random quote: "It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64