Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5476
Next month in: 00:44:21
Server time: 11:15:38, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): burgerboys | rezins | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968

Details

Submitted by[?]: Woodsman Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3970

Description[?]:

1. No luxury products or products that are not vital to human survival and wellbeing may be tested on animals. Products classified as such are:
a) Purely cosmetic products.
b) Products for which substitutes already are available.

2. Medical animal tests must submit to review by an ethical council comprised of independent pharmacologists, general health experts and animal etologists. A compelling argument must be made that the test is of importance to human health and that the test results will be applicable to human bodies.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:20:07, January 16, 2016 CET
From Liberal Party of Davostan
ToDebating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968
MessageOppose, this discriminates against animals applying for jobs and working conditions in Davostan because they're animals.

Date19:29:31, January 16, 2016 CET
From Common Sense Conservative Party
ToDebating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968
MessageOppose

Date02:30:35, January 18, 2016 CET
From Call of the Republic
ToDebating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968
MessageClearly the DPP has run out of excuses for its immoral positions.

Date09:52:05, January 18, 2016 CET
From Liberal Party of Davostan
ToDebating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968
MessageClearly the Call of the Republic has no warrant to allow animals to freely work in our great nation, as if they want a purely Terran, purely Davostani nation. One that animals are forced into areas they don't belong and forced to belong in a society not of their own. Now imagine replacing the word animals with Davostanis, would you like that scenario?

Date19:55:41, January 19, 2016 CET
From Woodsman Party
ToDebating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968
MessageThese "arguments" of the DPP are so ridiculous that we have to question our collegue's intelligence.

Date21:01:12, January 19, 2016 CET
From Liberal Party of Davostan
ToDebating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968
MessageInstead of calling me an idiot, try actually fighting them.

Date08:03:23, January 20, 2016 CET
From Woodsman Party
ToDebating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968
MessageOne can't argue against nonsense. But I will make an attempt. Animals don't apply for jobs. The equivalent of animal testing in the human world would be slavery, not employment.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 262

no
   

Total Seats: 214

abstain
 

Total Seats: 24


Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302

Random quote: "[The people] may forget what you said, but they will never forget how you made them feel." - Carl W. Buechner

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68