We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968
Details
Submitted by[?]: Woodsman Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3970
Description[?]:
1. No luxury products or products that are not vital to human survival and wellbeing may be tested on animals. Products classified as such are: a) Purely cosmetic products. b) Products for which substitutes already are available. 2. Medical animal tests must submit to review by an ethical council comprised of independent pharmacologists, general health experts and animal etologists. A compelling argument must be made that the test is of importance to human health and that the test results will be applicable to human bodies. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is unregulated.
Current: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Proposed: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the use of animals for research.
Current: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Proposed: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:20:07, January 16, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Party of Davostan | To | Debating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968 |
Message | Oppose, this discriminates against animals applying for jobs and working conditions in Davostan because they're animals. |
Date | 19:29:31, January 16, 2016 CET | From | Common Sense Conservative Party | To | Debating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968 |
Message | Oppose |
Date | 02:30:35, January 18, 2016 CET | From | Call of the Republic | To | Debating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968 |
Message | Clearly the DPP has run out of excuses for its immoral positions. |
Date | 09:52:05, January 18, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Party of Davostan | To | Debating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968 |
Message | Clearly the Call of the Republic has no warrant to allow animals to freely work in our great nation, as if they want a purely Terran, purely Davostani nation. One that animals are forced into areas they don't belong and forced to belong in a society not of their own. Now imagine replacing the word animals with Davostanis, would you like that scenario? |
Date | 19:55:41, January 19, 2016 CET | From | Woodsman Party | To | Debating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968 |
Message | These "arguments" of the DPP are so ridiculous that we have to question our collegue's intelligence. |
Date | 21:01:12, January 19, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Party of Davostan | To | Debating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968 |
Message | Instead of calling me an idiot, try actually fighting them. |
Date | 08:03:23, January 20, 2016 CET | From | Woodsman Party | To | Debating the Animal Testing Regulation Act 3968 |
Message | One can't argue against nonsense. But I will make an attempt. Animals don't apply for jobs. The equivalent of animal testing in the human world would be slavery, not employment. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 262 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 214 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 24 |
Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302 |
Random quote: "[The people] may forget what you said, but they will never forget how you made them feel." - Carl W. Buechner |