Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 01:25:59
Server time: 02:34:00, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Possession Of Royal Naughtiness (PORN) Act of 3969

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic-Republican Party (DRP)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 3969

Description[?]:

The Democratic-Republican Party is morally appalled that the Democratic Republic of Solentia allows everyone of all ages the ability to buy pornographic materials. The DRP believes pornography should only be allowed for legal adults.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:47:18, January 16, 2016 CET
From RISE Movement
ToDebating the Possession Of Royal Naughtiness (PORN) Act of 3969
MessageI can support this. We cannot let our children become porn zombies. We should not allow them access to sexually explicit content at such a young age.

Date23:53:01, January 16, 2016 CET
From Solentia National Congress (SNC)
ToDebating the Possession Of Royal Naughtiness (PORN) Act of 3969
MessageSNC supports this bill.

Date00:05:56, January 17, 2016 CET
From Free Democratic Party
ToDebating the Possession Of Royal Naughtiness (PORN) Act of 3969
MessageWe understand the pure motivation behind this, but porn is not a substance that can be consumed. Whether or not the substance is harmful to every kid is ambiguous and unknown. Therefore, as long as children are not in the pornographic materials, anyone should be able to buy it. This isn't alcohol or tobacco or weed, and kids should be told by their parents not to be looking at porn. If their parents do not care whether they look at porn, then it should be fine.

President Walter Bing

Date09:02:26, January 17, 2016 CET
From RISE Movement
ToDebating the Possession Of Royal Naughtiness (PORN) Act of 3969
MessageSo SFP, you're tellling me if a child is neglected by there parents they're fine to be allowed to look at porn, nice one.

Cracov

Date19:38:54, January 17, 2016 CET
From Democratic-Republican Party (DRP)
ToDebating the Possession Of Royal Naughtiness (PORN) Act of 3969
MessageThe DRP worked very hard in putting together a wonderful acronym for this legislation.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 246

no
    

Total Seats: 179

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset.

    Random quote: "To the youth of America, I say, beware of being trivialized by the commercial culture that tempts you daily. I hear you saying often that you're not turned on by politics. The lessons of history are clear and portentous. If you do not turn onto politics, politics will turn on you." - Ralph Nader

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 61