We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Possession Of Royal Naughtiness (PORN) Act of 3969
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic-Republican Party (DRP)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3969
Description[?]:
The Democratic-Republican Party is morally appalled that the Democratic Republic of Solentia allows everyone of all ages the ability to buy pornographic materials. The DRP believes pornography should only be allowed for legal adults. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The distribution, purchasing and possession of material depicting pornographic acts.
Old value:: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for everyone.
Current: All forms of pornography are illegal.
Proposed: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:47:18, January 16, 2016 CET | From | RISE Movement | To | Debating the Possession Of Royal Naughtiness (PORN) Act of 3969 |
Message | I can support this. We cannot let our children become porn zombies. We should not allow them access to sexually explicit content at such a young age. |
Date | 23:53:01, January 16, 2016 CET | From | Solentia National Congress (SNC) | To | Debating the Possession Of Royal Naughtiness (PORN) Act of 3969 |
Message | SNC supports this bill. |
Date | 00:05:56, January 17, 2016 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Possession Of Royal Naughtiness (PORN) Act of 3969 |
Message | We understand the pure motivation behind this, but porn is not a substance that can be consumed. Whether or not the substance is harmful to every kid is ambiguous and unknown. Therefore, as long as children are not in the pornographic materials, anyone should be able to buy it. This isn't alcohol or tobacco or weed, and kids should be told by their parents not to be looking at porn. If their parents do not care whether they look at porn, then it should be fine. President Walter Bing |
Date | 09:02:26, January 17, 2016 CET | From | RISE Movement | To | Debating the Possession Of Royal Naughtiness (PORN) Act of 3969 |
Message | So SFP, you're tellling me if a child is neglected by there parents they're fine to be allowed to look at porn, nice one. Cracov |
Date | 19:38:54, January 17, 2016 CET | From | Democratic-Republican Party (DRP) | To | Debating the Possession Of Royal Naughtiness (PORN) Act of 3969 |
Message | The DRP worked very hard in putting together a wonderful acronym for this legislation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 246 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 179 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset. |
Random quote: "To the youth of America, I say, beware of being trivialized by the commercial culture that tempts you daily. I hear you saying often that you're not turned on by politics. The lessons of history are clear and portentous. If you do not turn onto politics, politics will turn on you." - Ralph Nader |