We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Forest Management.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Zardugal's centrists
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2173
Description[?]:
| for protection of our forests and better management (and some more federalization of course) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: All forestry is performed by private companies.
Current: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Proposed: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:43:37, January 19, 2006 CET | From |  New Daio Party | To | Debating the Forest Management. |
| Message | Regulations on what private companies may do with forests are already in place. This is a case where if government need not be involved, it should not get involved. Larger government (even if it's prefectural), thus I vote nay. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 209 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 243 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 49 |
| Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
| Random quote: "When I see a 9/11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, "Oh shut up" I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining." - Glenn Beck |