Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5471
Next month in: 00:47:35
Server time: 03:12:24, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Banking Act 3982

Details

Submitted by[?]: Vanguard Communist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3983

Description[?]:

We can no longer accept that the control of our citizens money is in control of private banking institutions. We propose that that the Central Government own and operate all banks in our nation. To fully ensure that all citizens are treated fairly, regardless of the size of their bank account.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:06:58, February 12, 2016 CET
FromVanguard Communist Party
ToDebating the National Banking Act 3982
MessageWe would have thought to have had the support of the DLP on this measure.

Date21:14:10, February 12, 2016 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the National Banking Act 3982
MessageIt's okay RSP you will take half their seats in 18 months time.

Date21:19:16, February 12, 2016 CET
FromVanguard Communist Party
ToDebating the National Banking Act 3982
MessageHopefully we can take a number of parties seats next election.

Date22:17:17, February 12, 2016 CET
FromBailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
ToDebating the National Banking Act 3982
MessageWe would prefer this to be allocated to local governments if the option were available. We would prefer this option be set to:
The government operates large, national banks, but small community based private banks are allowed.

We will vote yes regardless because this policy is better than the completely privatized alternative.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 79

no
   

Total Seats: 671

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play".

Random quote: "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55