Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 03:24:44
Server time: 00:35:15, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Reclamation and Progress Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Vanguard Communist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3983

Description[?]:

Continuing the reclamation of powers devolved to local governments.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:55:39, February 13, 2016 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Reclamation and Progress Act
MessageWe agree with all except Article 5. We believe there should be a range of different standards depending on its uses.

Date12:56:24, February 13, 2016 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Reclamation and Progress Act
MessageHowever, we believe this is an entirely positive step forward. We will be voting in favour of this bill.

Date14:33:01, February 13, 2016 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Reclamation and Progress Act
Messagehttp://classic.particracy.net/viewnews.php?after=23748&before=23760&nation=9


The option polls show your party could well be punished by the electorate, especially over article one.

Date04:05:34, February 14, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Reclamation and Progress Act
MessageWe do not agree with Article 3, but as we agree with the others, we will vote in favour of this bill. I will draw up a bill that is an alternative to Article 3

Date13:41:38, February 14, 2016 CET
FromUnsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
ToDebating the Reclamation and Progress Act
MessageThe BPDP has changed their rules on supporting bills with more than 1 article. If a bill has an article that the BPDP does not agree with, the BPDP will vote it down

Date17:52:53, February 14, 2016 CET
FromVanguard Communist Party
ToDebating the Reclamation and Progress Act
MessageThe VCP submits that the BPDP is folding to outside reactionary pressure.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 267

no
   

Total Seats: 483

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election.

Random quote: "Bigotry is the disease of ignorance, of morbid minds; enthusiasm of the free and buoyant. Education and free discussion are the antidotes of both." - Thomas Jefferson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 82