We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defense Industries Act 3987
Details
Submitted by[?]: Our Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3988
Description[?]:
| Be it enacted by Parliament that both private and government-owned defense industries will coexist with one another while maintaining a reasonable amount of independence from one another, as a means to share the costs of maintaining the armed forces between the government and private industry. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns all defence industries.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:56:00, February 23, 2016 CET | From | Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP) | To | Debating the Defense Industries Act 3987 |
| Message | Yes, let's turn war into an industry, that will certainly progress our nation into the right direction. |
| Date | 02:02:31, February 23, 2016 CET | From | Our Movement | To | Debating the Defense Industries Act 3987 |
| Message | We want both the government and the private sector to be responsible for their actions in war, not turn war into a profitable market. |
| Date | 09:54:21, February 23, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Defense Industries Act 3987 |
| Message | We agree with this. But privatisation of defence industries then saying you don't want to turn them into profitable enterprises? Confused thinking to say the least. |
| Date | 16:01:03, February 23, 2016 CET | From | Our Movement | To | Debating the Defense Industries Act 3987 |
| Message | Not if you consider how costly maintaining the armed forces only by the government is. |
| Date | 22:21:21, February 23, 2016 CET | From | Vanguard Communist Party | To | Debating the Defense Industries Act 3987 |
| Message | This will be the first steps toward a military-industrial complex in Beluzia. |
| Date | 02:55:07, February 24, 2016 CET | From | Our Movement | To | Debating the Defense Industries Act 3987 |
| Message | We don' believ that business should profit from war |
| Date | 04:22:16, February 24, 2016 CET | From | Vanguard Communist Party | To | Debating the Defense Industries Act 3987 |
| Message | Then why propose this at all? Private industries will profit no matter what you Beleive in this system. |
| Date | 19:24:45, February 24, 2016 CET | From | Our Movement | To | Debating the Defense Industries Act 3987 |
| Message | They won't be able to loot the places that they take over. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 317 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 433 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
| Random quote: "A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise." - Niccolo Machiavelli |