We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Former Presidents and Premiers Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kushite Revolution
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3992
Description[?]:
| The Kushite government would like to submit a proposal that allows for the following for former heads of state and government: That after leaving office; They shall still receive allowances for keeping an office,a house, medical and local movement not exceeding 50% of their salary as president. They shall still have exclusive use of the Hobrazia One and Hobrazia Two,which are the planes used in the airborne transportation of the president and the premier. They together with their family shall still receive full state security offered by the elite wing that guards the head of state. They shall still be briefed by the National Intelligence Unit on the state of the nation. That on leaving power,the state shall gift them with the vehicles that were used in their convoys as a sign of gratitude for great leadership. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:11:36, March 01, 2016 CET | From |  Conservative Party of Hobrazia | To | Debating the Former Presidents and Premiers Bill |
| Message | We agree to this bill |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 75 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America). |
| Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |