We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal Testing Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal and Progressive Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3993
Description[?]:
| It is much better that we test products on animals than on human beings. We should not put any regulation on the right to do so. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Current: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Proposed: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is unregulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: The use of animals in research is subject to basic regulations.
Current: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Proposed: There are no restrictions on the use of animals for research.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:51:23, March 04, 2016 CET | From |  Common Sense Conservative Party | To | Debating the Animal Testing Act |
| Message | Support |
| Date | 13:50:41, March 04, 2016 CET | From | Liberal Party of Davostan | To | Debating the Animal Testing Act |
| Message | Support |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 302 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 81 |
| Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
| Random quote: "If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it." - Ken Livingstone |