We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: True Christian Morality For A True Christian Country
Details
Submitted by[?]: DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2176
Description[?]:
| We should not allow such anti-Christian activities in our great country! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: Crossdressing is allowed.
Current: Local governments determine the legality of crossdressing.
Proposed: Crossdressing is prohibited by the state.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Current: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Proposed: Public nudity is illegal and prosecuted as a civil offence.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:35:33, January 21, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the True Christian Morality For A True Christian Country |
| Message | Article 1 we will oppose. We will support if its allowed in the home but not in public. Article 2 we might be able to support but we want to hear your reasons for changing this law. |
| Date | 18:17:24, January 21, 2006 CET | From | DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party | To | Debating the True Christian Morality For A True Christian Country |
| Message | Article 2: Our reasons here are twofold. First of all, allowing private nudist colonies indicates that there is nothing wrong with public nudity at all, which is completely untrue. We must instill proper moral values into our children. Second of all, these colonies/beaches may be 'private' but that doesn't mean that they are completely out of view of children where they could easily become corrupted. We'll get back to you on article 1. |
| Date | 18:55:31, January 21, 2006 CET | From | Redneck Party | To | Debating the True Christian Morality For A True Christian Country |
| Message | We support both peices. |
| Date | 22:28:32, January 21, 2006 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the True Christian Morality For A True Christian Country |
| Message | We do not support article 1. With crossdressing, as long as it is appropriate (following general dresscode laws already in effect that do not permit bare chests or genitals), there is nothing wrong with it. This would prohibit women from wearing "traditionally male" clothing such as loose shirts or jeans. |
| Date | 23:18:21, January 21, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the True Christian Morality For A True Christian Country |
| Message | opposed. I do not like the bill description and also we are progressive when it comes to civil rights. |
| Date | 23:24:28, January 21, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the True Christian Morality For A True Christian Country |
| Message | Last opinion I saw was that the people are still restrictive when it comes to civil rights. However, in this case, We'll oppose both articles. |
| Date | 22:47:27, January 24, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the True Christian Morality For A True Christian Country |
| Message | i mean we as in the ONCP. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 68 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 231 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
| Random quote: "A conservative is a man who believes that nothing should be done for the first time." - Alfred E. Wiggam |