We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Locality Crossdressing Provision
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Daio Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2174
Description[?]:
Federalism. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: Crossdressing is allowed.
Current: Crossdressing is allowed.
Proposed: Local governments determine the legality of crossdressing.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:38:16, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Zardugal's centrists | To | Debating the Locality Crossdressing Provision |
Message | why bother with crossdressing? let the people act as they wish... |
Date | 01:16:39, January 23, 2006 CET | From | New Daio Party | To | Debating the Locality Crossdressing Provision |
Message | Indeed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 305 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 147 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 49 |
Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
Random quote: "In a sense we have come to our nation's capital to cash a cheque. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." - Martin Luther King Jr. |