Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 01:24:29
Server time: 14:35:30, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): rezins | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 3998

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3998

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:38:59, March 14, 2016 CET
FromConservative Union
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 3998
MessageMr Speaker,

We offer our cabinet proposal for the consideration of this Senate. We invite the New Dawn and Gaduridos Civic Forum parties to join us in coalition.

Date21:50:38, March 14, 2016 CET
FromRadical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 3998
MessageMr Speaker,

We believe that this coalition proposal will pass, and we can assure that we will offer our full capabilities as an opposition party to scrutinize the government and its policies. We will humbly support this cabinet proposal although we are not in it for many obvious reasons, it would be stupid to oppose it as it the people have seen these three parties fit to lead the nation.

Eva Moreno,
Interim Leader of the Radical Party

Date21:53:20, March 14, 2016 CET
FromSocial Democratic
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 3998
MessageMr Speaker,

We reluctantly agree.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 678

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 72


    Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play".

    Random quote: "The communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideas." - Karl Marx

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59