We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Morality Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Covenanters (IA)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2174
Description[?]:
The Church demands an end to public immorality. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: Crossdressing is allowed.
Current: Crossdressing is allowed.
Proposed: Crossdressing is prohibited by the state.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Current: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Proposed: All public displays of affection are illegal, except brief greeting exchanges between close relatives.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: The use of cannabis is legal.
Current: Recreational drug use is regulated by local governments.
Proposed: Recreational drug use is forbidden.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 11:11:13, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Public Morality Bill |
Message | I cannot agree to articles one and two, |
Date | 17:43:28, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Public Morality Bill |
Message | 2 is insane! Hells, we might be a center-right Muslim party, but banning all public displays of affection? Not even hugs? Do you know what this will do to the people? Sexual Crime rates will go UP UP UP! Why? Because people always try to "seize the forbidden fruit", so to speak. But supressing their emotional and physical development, you're going to make them crazy. Say goodbye to a sense of morals, buddies. |
Date | 22:26:45, January 22, 2006 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Public Morality Bill |
Message | There never was a sense of morals outside of the Christian coalition anyway! Murder, sodomy, drugs, prostitution and gambling were all okay in your books! |
Date | 12:56:40, January 23, 2006 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Public Morality Bill |
Message | They weren't ok; they were tolerable. By the way, I never supported Prostitution, and I only legalised Marijuana so we could direct our resources at the "big guns". Also, I only supported small-scale gambling, and I tolerated Homosexuality, that's it. I supported Euthanasia, because is it REALLY living when you are in a persistan vegetive state? |
Date | 13:20:31, January 23, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Public Morality Bill |
Message | We in the GIM oppose murder, gambling, and most forms of drugs, so the Christian coalition does not have a monopoly on morality, although they do have a monopoly on hipocrasy, condemning abortion and euthanasia, but condoning the death penalty, among other things. |
Date | 14:16:20, January 23, 2006 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Public Morality Bill |
Message | We only condone the dealth penalty for high treason and heresy. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 551 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 124 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 75 |
Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663 |
Random quote: "The streets are safe in Philadelphia, it's only the people who make them unsafe." - Frank Rizzo |