Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5477
Next month in: 01:05:36
Server time: 10:54:23, April 30, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Progress Act of 4005

Details

Submitted by[?]: Praetorian Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4006

Description[?]:

X

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:04:25, March 30, 2016 CET
FromThe NAZI Party of BALTUSIA
ToDebating the Progress Act of 4005
MessagePeople are fed up with your ridiculous proposals, hence why I have more votes. I want what's best for the nation, you may see me as a tyrant but I am not. I want to protect our citizens, I will do what I can for the God Almighty. Terra deserves a just nation and we will be just that

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 218

no
 

Total Seats: 532

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves." - Confucius

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59