Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 01:59:19
Server time: 06:00:40, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Riforma istituzionale (Seconda proposizione)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Partito Comunista dei Lavoratori

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4007

Description[?]:

Visti i recenti risultati elettorali all'insegna della divisione troviamo importante approvare una riforma istituzionale al più presto.

(Rimando alla precedente discussione: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=466261 )

----

Seen the recent electoral results in the name of division, we find important to approve an istitutional reform as soon as possible.

(A link to the precedent discussion: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=466261 )

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:04:46, April 01, 2016 CET
FromFronte popolare
ToDebating the Riforma istituzionale (Seconda proposizione)
MessageNoi del Fronte Popolare siamo disposti ad accettare i primi 4 articoli, riguardo al quinto articolo al momento siamo d'accordo con una maggiore regolazione ma non così stretta come proposta. Per quanto riguarda l'articolo 6 il Fronte Popolare è diviso al suo interno tra le opinioni dei suoi membri ed al momento non si sente di votare in merito.

Date08:05:55, April 01, 2016 CET
FromFronte popolare
ToDebating the Riforma istituzionale (Seconda proposizione)
MessageWe the People's Front we are willing to accept the first 4 proposals, with respect to the fifth article when we agree with greater control but not so tight as proposed. Regarding Article 6, the Popular Front is internally divided between the views of its members and at the moment it does not feel to vote about.

Date14:47:41, April 01, 2016 CET
FromPartito Comunista dei Lavoratori
ToDebating the Riforma istituzionale (Seconda proposizione)
MessageI'm happy to see that there's a large agreement on this bill. We lighted the Article 5 to meet your request, but on the sixth we have to say that this is one of the most important points in the reform, we won't delete it. But we will leave you some time to reflect on the simplification of the system introduced with this proposal, then we hope all your members will agree and we will approve this great bill!

Date16:41:08, April 01, 2016 CET
FromPartito Comunista dei Lavoratori
ToDebating the Riforma istituzionale (Seconda proposizione)
MessageRettifica: Anche il Nuovo Movimento Sociale Italiano ha avuto diverse discussioni al suo interno concerni il sesto articolo. A causa di ciò abbiamo deciso di rimuoverlo e mandare in votazione il provvedimento senza tale articolo.

Even the NMSI had multiple inside discussions concerning the sixth article. Because of that we decided to remove it and proceeding to vote.

Date16:59:33, April 01, 2016 CET
FromPartito Comunista dei Lavoratori
ToDebating the Riforma istituzionale (Seconda proposizione)
MessageOOC: Goddamn I did an error. I deleted another article instead of this -.-'

Date17:00:10, April 01, 2016 CET
FromPartito Comunista dei Lavoratori
ToDebating the Riforma istituzionale (Seconda proposizione)
MessageMaybe we should all abstain from this bill and vote the next I'll propose with the right articles.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 189

no
  

Total Seats: 306

abstain
  

Total Seats: 110


Random fact: Players should not role-play characters without the consent of the owner, and if they find they have role-played the character beyond what the owner intended, they should withdraw or amend the role-play appropriately.

Random quote: "The moral justification of capitalism does not lie in the altruist claim that it represents the best way to achieve 'the common good.' It is true that capitalism does, if that catch-phrase has any meaning, but this is merely a secondary consequence. The moral justification for capitalism lies in the fact that it is the only system consonant with man's rational nature, that it protects man's survival qua man, and that its ruling principle is justice." - Ayn Rand

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69