We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Local Reserves Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal and Progressive Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4019
Description[?]:
| This bill shall allow local communities do decide whether or not they wish to have and maintain forests using THEIR OWN money, not the federal government's. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: All forestry is performed by private companies.
Current: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Proposed: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:54:09, April 04, 2016 CET | From |  Common Sense Conservative Party | To | Debating the Local Reserves Act |
| Message | Support |
| Date | 20:41:14, April 17, 2016 CET | From | National Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Local Reserves Act |
| Message | Support |
| Date | 16:30:44, April 23, 2016 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Local Reserves Act |
| Message | Privatization of nature is dangerous. We support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 62 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 438 |
| Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
| Random quote: "What we are doing to the forests of the world is but a mirror reflection of what we are doing to ourselves and to one another." - Gandhi |