Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:36:46
Server time: 19:23:13, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AR Drax | ChevaldelaMer | Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended

Details

Submitted by[?]: Heradite Yunitou

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2177

Description[?]:

In which Tobacco is unhealthy towards the citizens, and in which it causes loss of work quality a ban on Tobacco must be made. ror have these restrictions:

1. Tobacco may only be purchased if the Doctor says they are healthy enough.

2. Tobacco may only be purchased with a Credit Card and a ID Card to keep Teenagers from taking some.

3. Tobacco may only be purchased in Government-apporived stores.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:34:51, January 23, 2006 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageDrug prohibition has never worked in the past. We don't see why it would work this time.

Date04:08:30, January 23, 2006 CET
FromHeradite Yunitou
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageIn some cases it has worked.

Date07:53:34, January 23, 2006 CET
FromLiberal Party of Indrala
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageThis is a very authoritarian measure. If it were moderated we may consider support.

Date11:11:47, January 23, 2006 CET
FromInrala Panjoregu Kiokutou (DPP)
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageAs a liberal party, we will never support measures such as this.

Date13:24:20, January 23, 2006 CET
FromHeradite Yunitou
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageAnd by what means do you mean to moderate it?

Date16:10:47, January 23, 2006 CET
FromInrala no Ikolowagitou (Green)
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageWe firmly believe in the right and responsibility of citizens to make their own choices. We fully support impartial education on the dangers of various substances, but believe that individuals must be free to make their own decisions.

We are opposed.

Date23:33:13, January 23, 2006 CET
FromPopulist Islamic Workers' League
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageWe are also opposed.

Date04:38:18, January 24, 2006 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageWhat are the "certain restrictions" proposed in the amended bill?

Date06:17:09, January 24, 2006 CET
FromHeradite Yunitou
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageThe following three:

1. Tobacco may only be purchased if the Doctor says they are healthy enough.

2. Tobacco may only be purchased with a Credit Card and a ID Card to keep Teenagers from taking some.

3. Tobacco may only be purchased in Government-apporived stores.

Date12:37:19, January 24, 2006 CET
FromLiberal Party of Indrala
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageA flat no from me.

Date12:41:29, January 24, 2006 CET
FromInrala Panjoregu Kiokutou (DPP)
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageQuite frankly we believe it ridiculous to wrap people up in cotton wool in this manner. The state should not be protecting individuals from themselves, and if a person wants to do something with his/her own body in the full knowledge that it could be detrimental to health or even life-threatening, then they should be allowed to do so. In short, people should take personal responsibility for their own bodies. We will not support bills that further the growth of the Nanny State, which is exactly what this bill will do.
Regulation 1 would be very hard to police, but more importantly, the addictive nature of tobacco would cause those denied the right to purchase such a product to resort to buying from criminals rather than stop smoking. The proposal would therefore fuel the black market, and provide a further source for manipulation of individuals.
Regulation 2 is an unecessary restriction on individual freedom, whilst Regulation 3 is an unecessary regulation on the free market.

We therefore oppose.

Date13:31:32, January 24, 2006 CET
FromHeradite Yunitou
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessagePerhaps but what if someone who is unhealthy gets some tobacco they are ensured death even more. Or if a kid makes a false ID card and gets away with it. It is harder to forge a Credit Card-and if they are a minor with a Credit Card maybe checks could be used,

And the Government-run stores so we can trust them-and so it is easier to moniter.

If an addict is unhealthy (he shouldn't have a problem with anything else) then he should be sent to a Drug Recuperating place.

Date14:19:16, January 24, 2006 CET
FromInrala Panjoregu Kiokutou (DPP)
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessagePeople should take personal responsibility for their own health, the government should not be forced to, and indeed has no right to intervene. If somebody wants to write their own death wish, let them. Quite simply, it's not the problem of the state............

Date23:59:29, January 24, 2006 CET
FromHeradite Yunitou
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageI thought the state's charge was over their people so they could lead a good and peaceful life. Not kill themselves.

Date00:32:15, January 25, 2006 CET
FromInrala Panjoregu Kiokutou (DPP)
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageIn our view: "The state has a duty to protect the Individual from other Individuals, but not from himself (or herself to be politically correct)". In opposing this bill, we are holding true to this belief.

Date03:45:43, January 25, 2006 CET
FromInrala no Ikolowagitou (Green)
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageOOC: When a proposal contains parameters (for example "certain restrictions" in this case), please place them in the formal bill description. Comments in debate do not form part of the bill.

Since the game can't cover all options, you can also use the description to modify the formal proposals to some extent, but not to the point of contradiction, or to where a different formal proposal would be a closer match for the intent.

IC: We shudder at the concept of "government approved stores". We remain opposed.



Date01:38:36, January 26, 2006 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the The Sale of Tobacco-Ammended
MessageWe oppose this measure.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 5

no
      

Total Seats: 88

abstain
 

Total Seats: 7


Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules.

Random quote: "In politics, madame, you need two things: friends, but above all an enemy." - Brian Mulroney

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 83