We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Legislation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4012
Description[?]:
Re-proposal in legislation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding bestiality (performing sexual acts with animals).
Old value:: Bestiality is only legal if it causes no damage to the animals concerned.
Current: Bestiality is illegal.
Proposed: Bestiality is illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Listing of controversial ingredients, such as genetically modified (GM) ingredients (if food labelling is applied).
Old value:: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing must be listed. There is no requirement to disclose GM ingredients.
Current: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Proposed: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning the use of pesticides.
Old value:: Farmers are required to list chemicals used on their crops.
Current: The government approves and regulates agricultural chemical use.
Proposed: The government approves and regulates agricultural chemical use.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:31:07, April 10, 2016 CET | From | Partei für Fortschritt u. Gerechtigkeit | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | We are opposed to all Articles. |
Date | 23:35:46, April 10, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | Perhaps we can make a counteroffer. Article number 4 prevents our citizens from getting sick. Article 1. as we already have charter-schools which are made to meet standards, the same should apply to private schools. Article 3 is just down right immoral and goes against animal rights. Article 6 goes with article 4 so our citizens know what they are eating. |
Date | 02:39:54, April 11, 2016 CET | From | Zentristische Partei von Albrunn | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | Why article 3? |
Date | 02:45:25, April 11, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | OOC I again keep messing my articles up. |
Date | 02:46:08, April 11, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | OOC 3 because we already are running on our "political views" |
Date | 02:46:37, April 11, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | 3 can do away with, but all the rest make sense |
Date | 08:11:52, April 11, 2016 CET | From | Sozialistische Einheitspartei Dundorfs | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | We support art 3,4 and 6. |
Date | 13:55:25, April 11, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | So what can we compromise about 1,2, and 5. |
Date | 17:40:17, April 11, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | It is time to move on. We are 1 out of 3 countries to not allow the stock market. |
Date | 00:24:45, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | What needs to go and what needs to stay? |
Date | 03:24:42, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Sozialistische Einheitspartei Dundorfs | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | Agreed. |
Date | 04:31:48, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Partei für Fortschritt u. Gerechtigkeit | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | We are strictly opposed to Articles 1 and 3. |
Date | 04:32:46, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | If you approve of 2, you have to approve of 3. |
Date | 04:35:39, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | This would determine if people wanted to buy the product or not, and also, the government regulates rule number 2 so rule number 3 would be enforced. |
Date | 04:38:38, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Partei für Fortschritt u. Gerechtigkeit | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | Article 2 concerns chemicals as does the current law you want to change with Article 3. So there is really no reason why 2 should imply 3. Besides we prefer the current law concerning pesticides. |
Date | 04:51:20, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | Some people may not want it on their products, so we don't want to require them to use them. |
Date | 05:29:17, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Partei für Fortschritt u. Gerechtigkeit | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | And some people don't want salad grown by a homosexual farmer, should we require labeling that too? As long as there is no prove whatsoever and no rational reason to assume that GM crops are in any way dangerous requiring to list them is arbitrary and unreasonable. Besides all our food is genetically modified. The difference here is that it is not done by trial and error but scientifically and that there are rigourous tests before their sale is permitted. Requiring the declaration of GM ingredients is just pandering to anti-scientific and anti-progressive ideologists and the backwards thinking sheep who follow them. |
Date | 05:30:40, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | Seems like you are the lone goat <3 |
Date | 05:31:59, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Partei für Fortschritt u. Gerechtigkeit | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | That's fine by us. We would rather be right in the minority than wrong in the majority. |
Date | 05:32:16, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | IF you are environmentalist leaning, you would support the bill. |
Date | 05:33:04, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Partei für Fortschritt u. Gerechtigkeit | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | There is no connection between the one and the other. |
Date | 05:37:03, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | yes it does. If you are for the environment, you wouldn't want all farmers to be able to spray their crops. |
Date | 14:55:07, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Partei für Fortschritt u. Gerechtigkeit | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | OOC: I interpret the current pesticides law as being stricter than the proposed one. Ideally we would have regulation and declaration. You seem to take the proposed law to be stricter. If it is I agree on that Article. Not the others though. |
Date | 14:57:07, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | OOC. This is. |
Date | 15:12:06, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Partei für Fortschritt u. Gerechtigkeit | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | We agree on Article 2 but remain strictly opposed to the rest. |
Date | 15:54:20, April 12, 2016 CET | From | Demokratischen Sozialismus Partei | To | Debating the Legislation |
Message | That is fine. The bill is going to pass. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 330 | |||
no | Total Seats: 170 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players must never be asked for their Particracy password. This includes Moderation; a genuine Moderator will never ask for your password. |
Random quote: "Hunger makes a thief of any man." - Pearl S. Buck |