We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Stronger Diplomatic Immunity
Details
Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4013
Description[?]:
| The Neo-Democratic Party believes that the current Federal Union law completely abolishing diplomatic immunity is damaging to Federal Union representatives abroad. Countries hosting embassies of the Federal Union will be forced to adopt their own hard-line stance against diplomatic immunity, potentially endangering our diplomats to laws that are contrary to Federal Union policies and values. This bill does not fully instate diplomatic immunity, but gives foreign diplomats more protections, for the purpose of securing such protections for our own diplomats abroad. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning diplomatic immunity.
Old value:: The government grants no diplomatic immunity and foreign diplomats are subject to arrest and prosecution and civil action under all laws of the host nation.
Current: The government grants no diplomatic immunity and foreign diplomats are subject to arrest and prosecution and civil action under all laws of the host nation.
Proposed: Diplomats are exempt from prosecution for criminal acts but not from civil lawsuits, but may still be expelled because of criminal acts.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:48:04, April 14, 2016 CET | From | All Progressive Party | To | Debating the Stronger Diplomatic Immunity |
| Message | Mr Speaker, An opinion poll was given between 4005- 4012 about the same and the citizens voted against such hence our stance as well against it. |
| Date | 10:48:18, April 14, 2016 CET | From | All Progressive Party | To | Debating the Stronger Diplomatic Immunity |
| Message | Mr Speaker, An opinion poll was given between 4005- 4012 about the same and the citizens voted against such hence our stance as well against it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 289 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 361 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Whilst the use of non-English languages can be appropriate for nation names, party names, constitutional titles and other variables, English is the official language of communication in the game. All descriptive texts and public communications should be in English or at least appear alongside a full English translation. |
| Random quote: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair |