We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Blasphemy act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4015
Description[?]:
To promote the moral values |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change State penalties for blasphemy
Old value:: No state penalties are issued for blasphemy.
Current: Both private and public blasphemy are considered grave offenses, and are heavily prosecuted.
Proposed: Public blasphemy is considered a criminal offense.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Current: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Proposed: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:00:08, April 17, 2016 CET | From | Libertarian Socialist Confederation | To | Debating the Blasphemy act |
Message | Shame! |
Date | 23:01:07, April 17, 2016 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Blasphemy act |
Message | This is not shameful this is protecting society and our military from inmoral actions |
Date | 04:05:57, April 18, 2016 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Blasphemy act |
Message | Why should the government define morality? |
Date | 19:17:16, April 18, 2016 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Blasphemy act |
Message | Because basic morality needs to be defined |
Date | 19:18:08, April 18, 2016 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Blasphemy act |
Message | It should be defined by the individual not the state. We don't need big daddy government ruling our lives. |
Date | 20:12:46, April 18, 2016 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Blasphemy act |
Message | This isn't big daddy this is basic principles in life. You are advocating anarchy, government should be small but it must protect us and provide basic morality as well. That's why it has a military and laws . We are a county of Laws not lawlessness |
Date | 23:08:28, April 18, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Equality Party | To | Debating the Blasphemy act |
Message | We strongly support the Libertarian party's arguments in this debate. |
Date | 23:29:08, April 18, 2016 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Blasphemy act |
Message | Well you people don't realize governments duty to the children |
Date | 00:24:25, April 19, 2016 CET | From | The Meritocracy Party | To | Debating the Blasphemy act |
Message | Government must allow for freedom of speech, religion and expression doing otherwise is attack on very hearth of secular state. This act must not be allowed to pass as it would mean violation of human rights. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 332 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 418 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302 |
Random quote: "Proud Darnussians? Darnussian is an insult, nothing more! You should all try to be more like we are, the Narikatonites!" - Nikolai Shukanov, former Narikatonite politician |