We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious Freedoms Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Farmers' Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2175
Description[?]:
| To set my people free. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Religious schools are not allowed.
Current: Religious schools are allowed, but are strictly regulated. Only recognised religions may set up religious schools.
Proposed: Only recognised religions may set up religious schools, with no regulations.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Remuneration of ministers of religion.
Old value:: Ministers of religion shall receive no remuneration whatsoever.
Current: The salaries and pensions of ministers of religion shall be borne by the state and regulated by the law.
Proposed: The state does not intervene in the remuneration of ministers of religion.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:02:36, January 24, 2006 CET | From | The Underworld Party | To | Debating the Religious Freedoms Bill |
| Message | No regulations? This must be a poor joke. All schools need regulations. |
| Date | 10:43:30, January 24, 2006 CET | From | National Farmers' Party | To | Debating the Religious Freedoms Bill |
| Message | Well obviously a minimum curriculum regulation would be exempt from the no regulation aspect of the proposal. |
| Date | 10:44:15, January 24, 2006 CET | From | National Farmers' Party | To | Debating the Religious Freedoms Bill |
| Message | I disagreed with the other proposal with 'heavily regulation'. |
| Date | 18:53:01, January 24, 2006 CET | From | Jewish Right Progressive Party | To | Debating the Religious Freedoms Bill |
| Message | Recognized religion? Because, *of course*, some religions are more factually correct than others. *Rolls Eyes* |
| Date | 20:49:15, January 24, 2006 CET | From | The party formerly known as Likud | To | Debating the Religious Freedoms Bill |
| Message | We agree with JRPP, that some religions are factually more correct then others, and that is why we support it...although we agree with labor that it should be regulated. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 56 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 44 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
| Random quote: "Nature provides a free lunch, but only if we control our appetites." - William Ruckelshaus |