We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Call for early elections, August 4020
Details
Submitted by[?]: Deleted party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: April 4021
Description[?]:
We, the Radical Military Party, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:00:32, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Kirlawan People's Justice Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 4020 |
Message | Exactly the same as yesterday http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=470427 I'm afraid we _still_ see no good reason for an early election at this time, sorry. |
Date | 03:16:35, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Kirlawan People's Justice Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 4020 |
Message | Just curious, if I may. Could you please explain what you are seeking to _accomplish_ with these? Is it just that you don't like our elections being on Sundays, and would prefer them to be on a different day of the week (probably Friday with how this bill is timed)? That, this bill could do. (But I OOCly like them being on Sundays, so I'd vote against anyway.) But if it's instead that you want more seats, well, there has been a mere one visibility-affecting bill which has been voted upon between the last election and now. http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=470212 And also, no parties have folded between then and now, so there are no vacant seats up for grabs. (The vast majority of the time, the purpose of an early election is specifically in order to redistribute such vacant seats left behind by a party which has recently vanished.) Both of which together mean: that an early election at this time would just give all of the parties right around the same number of seats as they already have right now. So, why bother? Or, might there be some other reason? Just curious.... |
Date | 08:48:53, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Party of Kirlawa | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 4020 |
Message | I agree with the KPJP. It is good that elections are held around the Sunday/Monday period, as that is when most players will be active. There really is no immediate need for a snap election. Do note that introducing five early election bills within a span of five game years will alert Moderation. |
Date | 08:50:29, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Conservative Party of Kirlawa | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 4020 |
Message | I will nonetheless vote for the bill since I really don't mind either way. It is unlikely to pass. |
Date | 13:19:15, April 29, 2016 CET | From | Our Future | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 4020 |
Message | It means hold 5 elections in 5 game years, not introduce 5 bills. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 216 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 412 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 89 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting that vote." - Unknown |