We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Culture Act I
Details
Submitted by[?]: True Freedom Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4022
Description[?]:
Read the bill |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Art subsidies
Old value:: The government subsidises artistic institutions and all artists.
Current: The government never subsidises or commissions art.
Proposed: The government never subsidises art, but may commission artworks for its own use.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:16:36, April 30, 2016 CET | From | Baltusian Communist Pro-life Party | To | Debating the Culture Act I |
Message | the government treat all artists equal right now, we don't care about the work, all artists receive subvention. but we can understand that the (libertarian) TFP want to get rid of (non-productive career), they hate arts |
Date | 18:16:37, April 30, 2016 CET | From | Baltusian Communist Pro-life Party | To | Debating the Culture Act I |
Message | the government treat all artists equal right now, we don't care about the work, all artists receive subvention. but we can understand that the (libertarian) TFP want to get rid of (non-productive career), they hate arts |
Date | 21:29:38, April 30, 2016 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Liberal | To | Debating the Culture Act I |
Message | No I agree with the change to The government subsidises artistic institutions and some artists on a case by case basis. |
Date | 21:44:06, April 30, 2016 CET | From | True Freedom Party | To | Debating the Culture Act I |
Message | Government has no place in the arts. You elitists disgust me. You claim to love the people but you miss-use their money and laugh at them when they demand responsible spending. Once again I am disappointed in the National Front. |
Date | 18:01:41, May 01, 2016 CET | From | Baltusian Communist Pro-life Party | To | Debating the Culture Act I |
Message | I don't believe the naitonal front and our party has the same idea. the BCPLP don't look at the content of arts, while the NF will judge arts on a case by case basis and only give money to arts following the good lines of the party, we don't judge arts, we give money to all artists, no matter if those artists are in our party of in an other party and yet, you accuse us of elitist, but a real elite who judge whose arts is superior to others. to us, art is art. end of the line. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 226 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 524 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
Random quote: "The United States is in no sense founded upon the Christian doctrine." - George Washington |