Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 00:47:34
Server time: 07:12:25, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): blowingnorthwind | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Minimal Border Control Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Milice

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2176

Description[?]:

Passport applications must be checked in order to ensure that the applicant is not a fradulent identity., and similarly we should be checking who is entering our nation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:07:19, January 25, 2006 CET
FromMilice
ToDebating the Minimal Border Control Bill
MessagePassport applications must be checked in order to ensure that the applicant is not a fradulent identity., and similarly we should be checking who is entering our nation.

Date00:08:01, January 25, 2006 CET
FromLibertarian League
ToDebating the Minimal Border Control Bill
Messageoppose

Date02:56:41, January 25, 2006 CET
FromReform Party
ToDebating the Minimal Border Control Bill
MessageWe agree.

Date13:26:00, January 25, 2006 CET
FromMilice
ToDebating the Minimal Border Control Bill
MessageLibertarians, why oppose? It is insane to allow anyone to get a passport? Surely you can see that it is not particularly hard for criminals to aquire multiple passports? Or for people smugglers to bring kidnapped girls into the country from abroad? We should at least strive to control our borders.

Date15:28:23, January 25, 2006 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Minimal Border Control Bill
MessageSupported

Date19:43:14, January 25, 2006 CET
FromLibertarian League
ToDebating the Minimal Border Control Bill
Messagealthough, it could make sense on paper, I don't want to open the floodgates to further government control on immigration

Date21:42:25, January 25, 2006 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Minimal Border Control Bill
MessageIf this doesnt pass I plan to propose more strict controls that we would actually prefer.

Compromise and centrism are the only way to succeed.

Date05:05:01, January 26, 2006 CET
FromLibertarian League
ToDebating the Minimal Border Control Bill
Messageif this doesn't pass how do you plan on something stricter to fly through... I'm having a hard time convincing myself against this bill, I'll support, but let this be the end of it.

Date08:36:16, January 26, 2006 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Minimal Border Control Bill
MessageWe didnt propose this, we would have proposed a more efffeective level of security.

If this fails, we will have to take matters into our own hands, that is all.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 62

no
  

Total Seats: 22

abstain
   

Total Seats: 11


Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70