We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Minimal Border Control Bill
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2176
Description[?]:
Passport applications must be checked in order to ensure that the applicant is not a fradulent identity., and similarly we should be checking who is entering our nation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Travel by nationals to foreign nations
Old value:: The nation issues passports on demand for any reason to its nationals
Current: The nation issues passports on demand for any reason to its nationals
Proposed: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes no border controls on visitors.
Current: The nation imposes no border controls on visitors.
Proposed: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:07:19, January 25, 2006 CET | From | Milice | To | Debating the Minimal Border Control Bill |
Message | Passport applications must be checked in order to ensure that the applicant is not a fradulent identity., and similarly we should be checking who is entering our nation. |
Date | 00:08:01, January 25, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian League | To | Debating the Minimal Border Control Bill |
Message | oppose |
Date | 02:56:41, January 25, 2006 CET | From | Reform Party | To | Debating the Minimal Border Control Bill |
Message | We agree. |
Date | 13:26:00, January 25, 2006 CET | From | Milice | To | Debating the Minimal Border Control Bill |
Message | Libertarians, why oppose? It is insane to allow anyone to get a passport? Surely you can see that it is not particularly hard for criminals to aquire multiple passports? Or for people smugglers to bring kidnapped girls into the country from abroad? We should at least strive to control our borders. |
Date | 15:28:23, January 25, 2006 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Minimal Border Control Bill |
Message | Supported |
Date | 19:43:14, January 25, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian League | To | Debating the Minimal Border Control Bill |
Message | although, it could make sense on paper, I don't want to open the floodgates to further government control on immigration |
Date | 21:42:25, January 25, 2006 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Minimal Border Control Bill |
Message | If this doesnt pass I plan to propose more strict controls that we would actually prefer. Compromise and centrism are the only way to succeed. |
Date | 05:05:01, January 26, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian League | To | Debating the Minimal Border Control Bill |
Message | if this doesn't pass how do you plan on something stricter to fly through... I'm having a hard time convincing myself against this bill, I'll support, but let this be the end of it. |
Date | 08:36:16, January 26, 2006 CET | From | Tuesday Is Coming | To | Debating the Minimal Border Control Bill |
Message | We didnt propose this, we would have proposed a more efffeective level of security. If this fails, we will have to take matters into our own hands, that is all. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 62 | |||
no | Total Seats: 22 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 11 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader |