Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5480
Next month in: 00:20:25
Server time: 15:39:34, May 09, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): SocDemDundorfian | Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of September 2175

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Calvinist Unionist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2176

Description[?]:

The Partito Nazionale Fascista propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Holy Luthori Empire.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:46:01, January 25, 2006 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2175
MessageTHIS is why I wanted more taxes. More money; more stuff with which to buy weapons. And stuff. I also added more money to certain departments, but took away some from others (WHY does the HoG need 1 billion pounds? He really does nothing, it's the other cabinet ministers who do junk), and I transfered the money I saved from taking away from the HoG and gave it to Health and Social Services, because we can't have potential warriors die from the flu, can we?

Date14:47:30, January 25, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2175
MessageThis is a BIG increase: but as it's mostly going to defence we'll overlook that IF the extra funds are raised appropriately.

Date14:51:12, January 25, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2175
MessagePNF's post wasn't there when I was typing mine. I'm glad you included the word 'potential' because servicemen would be looked after by their services' medical services, funded out of the defence budget.

For that matter the DHSS doesn't need much money, as all healthcare is private!

Date14:52:20, January 25, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2175
MessageI wonder if we will ever have a budget increase where most of the increase is not related to law enforcement and/or defence. We spend more on defence, internal affairs, and justice, than we do on foreign affairs, environment and tourism, food and agriculture, science and technology, education and culture, and health and social services, combined. Four out of every nine dollars we spend on the budget will be on defence, internal affairs, and justice.

Date14:59:30, January 25, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2175
MessageI don't mean to be pedantic but it's pounds, not dollars.

On a more important note: we're already taxing the majority of people 30% of their income. We really need to raise revenue by increasing their salaries, not increasing the proportion of them paid in tax.

Date15:09:29, January 25, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2175
MessageWe currently have only one way to increase salaries, and that is to set the minumum wage, and you have been against that.

Date15:13:56, January 25, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2175
MessageIt's bad for business. It standardises salaries, rather than raise them across the board, leads to unemployment in the casual work sector, leads to an increase of "cash in hand" work that remains below the minimum wage but evades taxation altogether, etc. We really need to improve Luthori's image with business by not imposing regulations on them every 6 years then removing them again!

Date16:36:04, January 25, 2006 CET
FromShuggoth Progressive Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2175
MessageWe would have liked to have seen an increase to both Environment and Tourism, and Food and Agriculture. But we will support this.

I agree that the HOG does not need that much!

Date17:16:17, January 25, 2006 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2175
MessageNotice that I added stuff to education and culture, health, trade, industry, trade, and infrastructure.

Date18:14:57, January 25, 2006 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2175
MessageWe do not support the tax hikes, and we damn sure will not support higher spending. It's criminal.

Date09:03:20, January 26, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of September 2175
MessageYes, the lack of your support is criminal.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 410

no
 

Total Seats: 85

abstain
   

Total Seats: 255


Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation.

Random quote: "Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time." - Winston Churchill

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70