Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:17:29
Server time: 19:42:30, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Emergency Powers Enabling Act - Phase 1

Details

Submitted by[?]: Partito della Rivoluzione Istaliana

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 4041

Description[?]:

For the defense of the Republic. The Socialist Democratic Party calls upon all responsible, patriotic forces in the Chamber to support the passage of these emergency measures. Should this pass, a second phase will be initiated, in which constitutional amendments will be proposed.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:47:17, June 07, 2016 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the Emergency Powers Enabling Act - Phase 1
MessageOCC: why we have to withdrawal from those treaties?

Date23:51:25, June 07, 2016 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the Emergency Powers Enabling Act - Phase 1
MessageOOC: it's necessary to procede with phase 2? A treaty may modify directly a legislation?

Date00:35:04, June 08, 2016 CET
FromPartito della Rivoluzione Istaliana
ToDebating the Emergency Powers Enabling Act - Phase 1
MessageOOC: Yes, those treaties affect our legislation directly; some proposals are barred as long as we are part of those treaties. I'm not sure if I understand the other question, but the constitutional amendments would be abolishing the PM for example. Which you agreed to earlier, but if you're having second thoughts that's also fine ;) just let me know before I go proposing it.

Date11:16:09, June 08, 2016 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the Emergency Powers Enabling Act - Phase 1
MessageOOC: I understand. it's ok. For the other question, I made a mistake!

Date22:36:02, June 08, 2016 CET
FromAlleanza Radicale - NCD
ToDebating the Emergency Powers Enabling Act - Phase 1
Messagethe cabinet proposal? Defeated?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 459

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 171


    Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

    Random quote: "More Medicament Manufacture take the profits, workers take the factory" - Boros Norbert, former Endralonian businessman

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 76