We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Emergency Powers Enabling Act - Phase 1
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partito della Rivoluzione Istaliana
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4041
Description[?]:
For the defense of the Republic. The Socialist Democratic Party calls upon all responsible, patriotic forces in the Chamber to support the passage of these emergency measures. Should this pass, a second phase will be initiated, in which constitutional amendments will be proposed. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: The military acts as a de-facto police force, with powers of arrest.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons apart from specially trained firearms units.
Current: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Proposed: Police officers carry military-grade equipment.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy with respect to the death penalty.
Old value:: The death penalty is illegal and is never to be applied.
Current: The death penalty is illegal and is never to be applied.
Proposed: The death penalty is not applied, except for terrorism, treason and crimes against mankind.
Article 5
Withdraw from the Nations Against Tyranny (NAT).
Article 6
Withdraw from the Media Freedoms Act.
Article 7
Withdraw from the International agreement to ban torture.
Article 8
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Article 9
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Proposed: The government has the right to monitor information of individuals without letting them know.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:47:17, June 07, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Emergency Powers Enabling Act - Phase 1 |
Message | OCC: why we have to withdrawal from those treaties? |
Date | 23:51:25, June 07, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Emergency Powers Enabling Act - Phase 1 |
Message | OOC: it's necessary to procede with phase 2? A treaty may modify directly a legislation? |
Date | 00:35:04, June 08, 2016 CET | From | Partito della Rivoluzione Istaliana | To | Debating the Emergency Powers Enabling Act - Phase 1 |
Message | OOC: Yes, those treaties affect our legislation directly; some proposals are barred as long as we are part of those treaties. I'm not sure if I understand the other question, but the constitutional amendments would be abolishing the PM for example. Which you agreed to earlier, but if you're having second thoughts that's also fine ;) just let me know before I go proposing it. |
Date | 11:16:09, June 08, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Emergency Powers Enabling Act - Phase 1 |
Message | OOC: I understand. it's ok. For the other question, I made a mistake! |
Date | 22:36:02, June 08, 2016 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the Emergency Powers Enabling Act - Phase 1 |
Message | the cabinet proposal? Defeated? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 459 | ||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 171 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "More Medicament Manufacture take the profits, workers take the factory" - Boros Norbert, former Endralonian businessman |