Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:55:22
Server time: 20:04:37, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Revised Income Tax Proposal: July 4043

Details

Submitted by[?]: Factio Conservativa

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 4044

Description[?]:

The Factio Nationalistia propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the Regnum de Selucia.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:31:09, June 13, 2016 CET
FromFactio Unitas
ToDebating the Revised Income Tax Proposal: July 4043
MessageOrator,

This plan decreases our income as a government by 20 billion SEN compared to our tax plan.

Date21:40:24, June 13, 2016 CET
FromFactio Conservativa
ToDebating the Revised Income Tax Proposal: July 4043
MessageOrator,

The Nationalist Party believe are economy must be safe and secure. Although this plan in comparison with yours is 20 billion SEN less, we believe it is a fairer plan for the citizens of this great nation. Also in another bill, our party will make up for this 20 BILLION short-fall through a raise in cooperation tax and luxury items.

Lord S CONSTANTINE IV
Chairman Of the Nationalist Party

Date22:27:03, June 13, 2016 CET
FromFactio Unitas
ToDebating the Revised Income Tax Proposal: July 4043
MessageOrator,

Our proposed tax rates are very low, there is no need to propose a lower one. After consideration, we also think your proposal to be a bit shakey in places - such as leaps from 2% to 3% increases per 2,500 SEN. Also, we see no need for a 1,000 SEN bracket if the rest of the plan has internvals of 2,500 SEN, not 1,000 SEN

Futhermore, for practical reasons we think we should use '§' to denote SEN, rather than spelling out the letters. E.i.: §5,000.

Belusius Magnus
Ministrator de Oeconomicis (Minister of Finance)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 245

no
  

Total Seats: 255

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism").

    Random quote: "Casting a vote shouldn't make you sick." - Ronnie Dugger

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 237