We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Intelligence and Armament Management Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partido Democrático
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4048
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Proposed: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Nation's policy with regards to an intelligence agency.
Old value:: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Current: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Proposed: The nation has an intelligence agency, but it is limited to counter-intelligence and surveillance of other countries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:35:11, June 20, 2016 CET | From | Partido Libertario de Egelion | To | Debating the National Intelligence and Armament Management Act |
| Message | The Partido Libertario doesn't believe this bill will be beneficial in the long term. We ask that NIE explain their position. |
| Date | 13:56:11, June 21, 2016 CET | From | Partido Democrático | To | Debating the National Intelligence and Armament Management Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The NIE simply thinks that if the republic is indeed committed to preventing use of biological and chemical weapons instead of putting this policy up as a sign of good will, as the current policy suggests, we should simply did ourselves of the right to develop them as well. That would be a true step towards peace and goodwill to solve problems diplomatically. Marco Iglesia Leader of NIE |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 175 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
| Random quote: "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is." - Bill Clinton |