We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: chemical warfair act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Freedom Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4059
Description[?]:
| This is to insure the safety of are people if are enemies no we have nukes then it puts us in a vulnerable position I'm not saying not to have them but to be more carful that means we need regulations. They should not be are priority. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Proposed: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:02:48, July 13, 2016 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Liberal | To | Debating the chemical warfair act |
| Message | This bill makes no sense. I'm not saying not to have them but to be more carful that means we need regulations. They should not be are priority. WHAT? |
| Date | 00:08:51, July 14, 2016 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the chemical warfair act |
| Message | Let me tell you something why should we spend loads of money on something that only offers mutual destruction.Somthing we never use but spend loads on it doesn't make sense.Before we had chemical warfare we were a very peaceful nation talk to country's now all we do is fight so I tell you it does make sense. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 546 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 204 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
| Random quote: "A conservative is a man who believes that nothing should be done for the first time." - Alfred E. Wiggam |