We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ambassadorial Freedom
Details
Submitted by[?]: AM Radical Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2180
Description[?]:
| WHEREAS It is in our best interests to maintain good, open relations with all other nations in our world, AND these relationjships can best be maintained by face to face meetings between all parties concerned; THEREFORE let it be resolved that all nations are welcome to open embassies in our land for the purpose of faciliting trade, discussing differences, and generally keeping the lines of communication open at all times. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Current: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Proposed: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:56:19, January 27, 2006 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Ambassadorial Freedom |
| Message | Dr. Fu Manchu; Candidate Minister for Foreign Affairs for the RLP, wishes to put this bill up for the kind consideration of the Convocation. "We can see no cause to put other nations through inspection and approval of our Foreign Office if they wish to open an embassy on our soil. This can only inhibit the flow of commerce and information, thereby marking us as a backwater in the flow of international intercourse. We are proud of our culture and our nation, and wish to allow any other nation to come here and see for themselves a superior, freedom loving land and peoples." |
| Date | 22:13:06, January 27, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Ambassadorial Freedom |
| Message | AMA is willing to approve, for the benefit of all Likatonia. |
| Date | 22:52:33, January 27, 2006 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the Ambassadorial Freedom |
| Message | We support this as well, but we do have one question, is there going to be anything in place to keep track of who sets up an embassy here? After all, hostile nations may use it for illicit reasons. |
| Date | 12:38:50, January 28, 2006 CET | From | Likaton Fascist Front | To | Debating the Ambassadorial Freedom |
| Message | We wish to echo the sentiments of Axis Mundi SLP in their entirety. |
| Date | 23:52:32, January 28, 2006 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Ambassadorial Freedom |
| Message | No |
| Date | 23:53:35, January 28, 2006 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Ambassadorial Freedom |
| Message | No |
| Date | 18:00:52, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the Ambassadorial Freedom |
| Message | We will be voting against it simply out of concern for national security. We agree with the spirit of this that all nations should be permitted to have an embassy on Likatonian soil without having to go through all that bureaucratic red tape.... but you know, security is important. |
| Date | 19:28:07, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Ambassadorial Freedom |
| Message | AMA supports the logic of our allies in AM SLP. We shall oppose, for now. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 116 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 295 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 89 |
| Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws. |
| Random quote: "We’ve got to stand with our North Korean allies." - Sarah Palin |