We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Partial privatisation of the Defence Industry
Details
Submitted by[?]: Greyistische Demokraten
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4076
Description[?]:
| We believe that at least some of the defence industry should be privately owned, in order to increase productivity. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns all defence industries.
Current: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:39:19, August 17, 2016 CET | From |   Ordnungsfraktion | To | Debating the Partial privatisation of the Defence Industry |
| Message | Private defence industry would only increase cost and bureacracy this reform is a way to let corruption in our country. |
| Date | 09:43:12, August 17, 2016 CET | From | Greyistische Demokraten | To | Debating the Partial privatisation of the Defence Industry |
| Message | Nope, Capitalism has proven to work, prices fall with time, because of constant competition. But we believe that we should also have some state-owned defence industries for economic and strategic reasons. How can this increase corruption? |
| Date | 09:46:11, August 17, 2016 CET | From | Ordnungsfraktion | To | Debating the Partial privatisation of the Defence Industry |
| Message | Herr Speaker, Check your language in the parliament "Nope" you are not at a rainbow-parade. -Marlon Thaller, Iron Ring Leader |
| Date | 09:53:11, August 17, 2016 CET | From | Greyistische Demokraten | To | Debating the Partial privatisation of the Defence Industry |
| Message | Herr speaker, Nope turely isn't the most suited word to be used in the Bundestag, but we still have the freedom of speech. Plus, how can partial privatisation increase corruption, sir? |
| Date | 09:55:23, August 17, 2016 CET | From | Ordnungsfraktion | To | Debating the Partial privatisation of the Defence Industry |
| Message | Herr speaker, We think through the increase of needed communication and bureaucracy the chance of corruption will be increased. |
| Date | 10:15:07, August 17, 2016 CET | From | Greyistische Demokraten | To | Debating the Partial privatisation of the Defence Industry |
| Message | Not much will change. Right now the government has to communicate with state-owned companies, after this bill passes the government will have to communicate with pivate companies in the same way. We have many inspections, plus the military and ministry of defence overlook the buying procedure. Private companies will have to compete with government owned companies, which will surely lead to creative development of New technologies. Plus private companies are also subject to regulation & several other government institutions are always keeping an eye on how things are going. |
| Date | 10:19:21, August 17, 2016 CET | From | Greyistische Demokraten | To | Debating the Partial privatisation of the Defence Industry |
| Message | Blahhh, I didnt mean overlook but oversee. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 424 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 76 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences. " - P. J. O Rourke |