Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:14:29
Server time: 19:45:30, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Economical Change

Details

Submitted by[?]: Modern Economic Party of Cobura

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2179

Description[?]:

changes to the economics of Cobura

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:31:50, January 29, 2006 CET
From Workers' Communist Party of Cobura
ToDebating the Economical Change
MessageRemove the bit about the Luxury tax and you will have LIA support.

Date04:45:34, January 29, 2006 CET
From Modern Economic Party of Cobura
ToDebating the Economical Change
Messagewe'd liek to add, we remove things for yes votes, plus we can also propose it in a different bill. only things we stand by and cannot allow any change does MEP sacrifice votes for.

Date01:27:27, January 30, 2006 CET
From Zapatista Party
ToDebating the Economical Change
MessageBollocks to this!

Date02:52:13, January 30, 2006 CET
From Cobura National Socialist Party
ToDebating the Economical Change
MessageWe cannot allow foreign companies the power over our industrial base.

Date06:02:10, January 30, 2006 CET
From Modern Economic Party of Cobura
ToDebating the Economical Change
Messagedude, cobura is in a crap state, we need foreign investors to keep us a float

Date03:22:41, February 01, 2006 CET
From Zapatista Party
ToDebating the Economical Change
MessageNo. How does foriegn money keep us afloat? Where do the profits go from a globalised company? The companies HOME country. Who loses out when the company goes under? Every other bugger! Hell no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 136

no
   

Total Seats: 246

abstain
  

Total Seats: 118


Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left.

Random quote: "Any system that takes responsibility away from people, dehumanises them." - Author Unknown

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67