We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Budget proposal of August 2178
Details
Submitted by[?]: Devout Ecologists Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2179
Description[?]:
The Devout Ecologists Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the New Rildanor. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
Head of Government | 1,500,000 RCR | 2,010,000,000 RCR | 1,000,000,000 RCR |
Foreign Affairs | 20,000,000,000 RCR | 2,000,000,000 RCR | 1,000,000,000 RCR |
Internal Affairs | 10,000,000,000 RCR | 4,000,000,000 RCR | 1,000,000,000 RCR |
Finance | 13,000,000,000 RCR | 5,000,000,000 RCR | 1,000,000,000 RCR |
Defence | 46,000,000,000 RCR | 500,000,000 RCR | 1,000,000 RCR |
Justice | 10,000,000,000 RCR | 10,000,000,000 RCR | 10,000,000,000 RCR |
Infrastructure and Transport | 15,000,000,000 RCR | 10,000,000,000 RCR | 10,000,000,000 RCR |
Health and Social Services | 74,500,000,000 RCR | 40,000,000,000 RCR | 20,000,000,000 RCR |
Education and Culture | 64,500,000,000 RCR | 19,000,000,000 RCR | 10,000,000,000 RCR |
Science and Technology | 19,000,000,000 RCR | 7,000,000,000 RCR | 1,000,000,000 RCR |
Food and Agriculture | 19,000,000,000 RCR | 6,000,000,000 RCR | 1,000,000,000 RCR |
Environment and Tourism | 19,000,000,000 RCR | 6,000,000,000 RCR | 1,000,000,000 RCR |
Trade and Industry | 40,000,000,000 RCR | 6,000,000,000 RCR | 1,000,000,000 RCR |
Total | 350,001,500,000 RCR | 117,510,000,000 RCR | 58,001,000,000 RCR |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 08:27:01, January 31, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2178 |
Message | Let me explain the proposal. I propose cutting. So what do you see? Cutting. Easy, don't you agree? To further explain. The RCW has proposed in the bill Less Restrictive Economy a regulation concerning corporation tax and luxury goods tax. Currently he is winning, becuase people are abstaining. Now, no big deal and all, but let's think about it. First of all, it's important we cut spending. So what do we do with the money? We can either increase spending again, allocating it on the posts we deem neccesairy, or we can cut taxes. Now, currently we are earning about a huge amount of money. Just something in between, if you look at the budget proposal screen.. you see a whole lotta 0's. I saw them without ',' in between. That amount of 0's is scary I tell you. The huge amount of money that is in the hands of the government! Anyway, we are earning about 119,000,000,000. That's right, 9 zero's! Huge. And we are spending about 117,000,000,000. Huge. Now if we cut taxes exactly like RCW proposed, we'll earn 6,900,000,000 less. We're currently getting a lot of money from population taxes, now I propose we lower that too (see other bill). So cut spending, cut gaining. Let the money roll in society, amongst the people. Now, let's look at how we should cut spending. I basicly chose those, 1,000,000,000 for every post. I consider Justice, Infrastructure, Defence, Health and Education exceptions. Why? Well, let's start with Health, the biggest. We give a lot of money to the people through laws. Minimum wages, etc, so that's why I consider it still the biggest expense. But less then before if we cut population taxes. Now Justice, Infrastructure and Education. Justice to stop crime, which I consider quite important, Infrastructure to uphold the free public transport system, Education and Culture because Education is one of the most important aspects in life, and culture is of general importance to the nation. Defense.. well, we are not in a war, we are a peace loving country, and I consider 1 Million RCR enough for the expenses concering Defense. So what do you all think? I will push this to a vote later, because I believe there will be early elections after the current bills have passed. |
Date | 10:44:52, February 01, 2006 CET | From | Advanced Intellectual Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2178 |
Message | Because the less restrictive economy bill passed I think a radical change like this might become necessary. |
Date | 01:25:01, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2178 |
Message | This is bad. Raise taxes and reintroduce the high sales and luxury taxes we had before to increase revenue. We can not abandon the commitments we have made to our citizens. |
Date | 04:06:19, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2178 |
Message | I really can't fathom why the Prime Minister's Office will do with 1 billion... Surely all he needs is a modest salary and room and travel expenses to be paid. |
Date | 04:38:26, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2178 |
Message | LPP, noticed how the taxes were decreased? We need to compensate. Or do you want a deficit? Raising taxes is obviously not going to work if they were decreased lately, instead of increased. We need to cut spending. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 207 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 108 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 122 |
Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time. |
Random quote: "Politics is perhaps the only profession for which no preparation is thought necessary." - Robert Louis Stevenson |