We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Environmental protection act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hequian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4100
Description[?]:
| We propose the following |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: All forestry is performed by private companies.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: Private companies are responsible for disposing of their own waste. The government disposes of residential waste.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation.
Current: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Proposed: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:38:53, October 04, 2016 CET | From | National Socialist Party | To | Debating the Environmental protection act |
| Message | Global warming is a hoax by governments: |
| Date | 22:51:50, October 04, 2016 CET | From | Centrist Party | To | Debating the Environmental protection act |
| Message | For what purpose? |
| Date | 08:37:49, October 05, 2016 CET | From | National Socialist Party | To | Debating the Environmental protection act |
| Message | Money making. You see all of these environmental 'schemes' where the money really goes to the government. |
| Date | 18:10:53, October 05, 2016 CET | From | Centrist Party | To | Debating the Environmental protection act |
| Message | The government would make far more money by extorting fossil fuels than investing in renewable. The often private entities in the renewable energy sector are supported by independent science foundations. Not everything is a conspiracy. |
| Date | 20:18:26, October 05, 2016 CET | From | National Socialist Party | To | Debating the Environmental protection act |
| Message | How gullible can you get? They are not independent, they are government backed, you liar. |
| Date | 00:03:35, October 06, 2016 CET | From | Hequian Party | To | Debating the Environmental protection act |
| Message | This bill has nothing to do with global warming |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 58 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 72 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
| Random quote: "Idealism is fine; but as it approaches reality, the cost becomes prohibitive." - William F. Buckley, Jr. |