We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal Research Rights
Details
Submitted by[?]: Northern Light
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2180
Description[?]:
We feel the need to impose some basic regulation to avoid torture to our fuzzy little critters. Also NL Social Analysis And Drink Division just dimostrated that cosmetics are 99% useless...so no need to waste money and animals on it. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is unregulated.
Current: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Proposed: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the use of animals for research.
Current: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Proposed: The use of animals in research is subject to basic regulations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:45:37, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Black Magic | To | Debating the Animal Research Rights |
Message | If cosmetics was the end of the story the bill would be simple . . . proposal? |
Date | 02:41:15, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Black Magic | To | Debating the Animal Research Rights |
Message | Yes, we can support this. We would like to see an end to animal research, but there is no other way to test certain products at this time except, perhaps, human prisoners - which I am sure would find little support. |
Date | 10:24:25, February 02, 2006 CET | From | KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti | To | Debating the Animal Research Rights |
Message | We will support this. We think that research passes throught the animal testing. |
Date | 15:41:16, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Konservativ Monarkistpartiet | To | Debating the Animal Research Rights |
Message | We have heard rumours that the NL Social Analysis And Drink Division did their research in a child brothel. |
Date | 18:29:32, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Northern Light | To | Debating the Animal Research Rights |
Message | Silly...a child brothel doesnt provide the necessary quality standard for this matter. NL used only the finest bars and pubs available. |
Date | 20:48:13, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Konservativ Monarkistpartiet | To | Debating the Animal Research Rights |
Message | Which would suggest their information was made up, no? |
Date | 22:29:05, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Northern Light | To | Debating the Animal Research Rights |
Message | Alchool sharpen the mind if correctly used, that's common sense. |
Date | 01:32:33, February 03, 2006 CET | From | Konservativ Monarkistpartiet | To | Debating the Animal Research Rights |
Message | Ah, so alcohol is good, then cigerettes are good also? |
Date | 13:45:35, February 03, 2006 CET | From | Northern Light | To | Debating the Animal Research Rights |
Message | Of course not. |
Date | 16:08:05, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Konservativ Monarkistpartiet | To | Debating the Animal Research Rights |
Message | How comes? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 34 | |||
no | Total Seats: 33 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 33 |
Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
Random quote: "If man asks for many laws, it is only because he is sure that his neighbor needs them; privately he is an unphilosophical anarchist, and thinks laws in his own case superfluous." - Will Durant |